JPN / ENG GREETINGS Introduction Part I: “SEE”̶ SEEING WHAT STATE OUR COMMON HOME IS IN̶ I. Seeing Through The […]
GREETINGS
Introduction
Part I: “SEE”̶ SEEING WHAT STATE OUR COMMON HOME IS IN̶
I. Seeing Through The Eyes of Laudato Si’
1 A Contemplative Mind and An Honest Look at The Facts
2 A Multidimensional Awareness Of The Problem
3 Fundamental Challenges—Renewing Humanity And Enhancing The Common Good
II. The Cry Of The Earth And The Cry Of The Poor
1 The Responsibilities Of Wealthy Countries
2 Typical Ecological Issues In Japan
3 Towards Changing Our Lifestyles
Part II: “DISCERN”̶DISCERNING IN THE LIGHT OF FAITH̶
I. The Divine Word Shedding Light On The Signs Of The Times
1 The Heart Of God The Creator
2 Human Responsibility
II. Papal Ministry Attentive To The Signs Of The Times
1 Pope John Paul II
2 Pope Benedict XVI
3 Pope Francis
Part III: “ACT” ̶ACTING FOR LIVING TOGETHER̶
I. Witnessing To God’s Love As A Responsible Global Citizen
1 Ecological Spirituality
2 Ecological Education
3 Learning From Environmental Education
4 Shaping History Together
II. Toward An Ecclesial Community Journeying And Discerning Together
1 Laudato Si’ Goals
2 The Laudato Si’ Plan
CONCLUSION
A Christian Prayer for the Protection of All Life
Scripture quotations contained herein, unless otherwise noted, are adapted from the New American Bible (Revised Edition), ©2010 by the Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Washington, D.C.
GREETINGS
The crisis of life that has engulfed the world since the beginning of 2020 was brought on by a tiny, invisible virus. This unknown virus has wreaked havoc on the world and made us realize the limits of human wisdom and knowledge. Yet often we continue to act as if we were the masters of the world. When we are hit by infectious diseases or natural disasters, we are made aware of our hubris, but unfortunately, memories formed by such experiences do not seem to last.
However, the earth on which we live is now crying out, tossed about by the fickleness of humanity and unable to endure its selfish domination.
Let’s look at climate change for instance. The report of Working Group II of the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was released in 2022. According to this report, the effects of global warming are occurring faster and affecting a wider range of ecosystems than predicted in the Fifth Assessment Report released in 2014, and more lives of the most vulnerable people are at risk. In 2023, Pope Francis published the Apostolic Exhortation Laudate Deum: On the Climate Crisis, which addressed the climate crisis, calling on all people of good will, those involved in politics, businesses, and citizens, to work together to address this issue. In Japan, climate change is making a major impact on people’s social and economic life, such as floods and landslides caused by heavy rains and typhoons, and the effects of temperature fluctuations on agriculture and fisheries. In addition, we are demolishing our common home, the Earth, through greenhouse gas emissions, the discharge of plastics and other debris into the oceans, and so on.
In May 2015, Pope Francis published the Encyclical Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home, in which he pointed out the importance of seeking ways to live in harmony with one another, since all creatures are interconnected. The Japanese bishops responded to this invitation by substantially revising the bishops’ pastoral document Reverence for Life: A New Look in 2017 to address environmental issues in more detail. In 2019, the Japanese Episcopal Commission for Social Issues began exploring how the Catholic Church in Japan should engage with environmental issues, and in response to its recommendations, the Bishops’ Conference had worked on this document since 2021.
The Synod’s path on which we are now journeying invites us to discuss what it truly means to walk together. Through this book, we, the bishops of Japan, would like to call you to listen to the cry of the earth and the poor, to discern it in light of God’s perspective, to be spiritually motivated by faith, and to walk together in concrete action. “As a Christian community” we aspire to “protect all life and testify with wisdom and courage” (Pope Francis, Homily at Mass in the Tokyo Dome, 25 November 2019). I sincerely hope that as many people as possible will respond to this call.
May 2024
+ Tarcisio Isao Kikuchi, SVD
President
The Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Japan
Introduction
Gratitude for the Gift of Creation
- 1“God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good.“ (1)These are the words of the first chapter of Genesis.
What do you think about the fact that your existence is good in God’s sight? How do you recognize the fact that everything God has created is interconnected and good as it is?
In 2015, Pope Francis issued his Encyclical Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home. The opening words of the encyclical, “Laudato Si’ (mi’ Signore)” mean “Praise be to You (my Lord).”
In other words, the encyclical begins with thanksgiving and praise for God’s gift of creation and teaches that “rather than a problem to be solved, the world is a joyful mystery to be contemplated with gladness and praise” (LS 12). When we address environmental issues, we are first invited to give thanks for God’s gifts in the form of the natural environment and to praise God for His creation.
Laudato Si’ highlights three major challenges:
- To praise the Creator in thanksgiving for the gift of nature (praise and thanksgiving).
- To lead a life recognizing the interconnectedness of all things (integral ecology).
- To heal wounded creation (practice of reconciliation).
Integral ecology, one of the central themes of Laudato Si’, seeks harmonious relationships “with God, with others, with nature, and with [oneself]” (LS 10), each of which is inextricably linked to the others. It reminds us afresh of such questions as what kind of laws exist in the natural world, created by the God of mercy and truth, and what kind of society we human beings, whose social nature is engraved in us by the same God, should aspire to be.
Pope Francis says that to know about the environment is “not to amass information or to satisfy curiosity, but rather to become painfully aware, to dare to turn what is happening to the world into our own personal suffering and thus to discover what each of us can do about it” (LS 19). He then poses the following questions (cf. LS 160).
- What kind of world do we want to leave to those who come after us, to the children who are now growing up?
- What is the purpose of our life in this world?
- What is the goal of our work and all our efforts?
- What need does the earth have of us?
How would you respond to the questions from the Pope?
The Purpose of this Book
- 2Through this book, we, the bishops of Japan, make a broad appeal to join in the effort to protect all life. We encourage everyone to learn from Laudato Si’ and to live in pursuit of integral ecology by fostering harmonious relationships with God, with others, with nature, and with ourselves, in our respective context, to move forward toward realizing the world as God created it to be.
Laudato Si’ invites us to ecological conversion. It is an invitation to each of us, in order to be reconciled with the created world, to ” examine our lives and acknowledge the ways in which we have harmed God’s creation through our actions and our failure to act. We need to experience a conversion, or change of heart” (LS 218).
All life, all creation is a gift of God. In this sense, nurturing all life is, for Christians, both a proclamation of faith and a witness to the Gospel. It can also be explained as participating in the building up of the Kingdom of God.
We are called to care for life in gratitude, and when life is trampled upon, to feel pain, raise our voices, and walk together to bring healing.
This book encourages a deeper understanding of the environment and ecology through three steps: SEE, DISCERN and ACT, and invites us to take action.
This three-step process originated from the practice of the Young Christian Workers (known as JOC: Jeunesse ouvrière chrétienne) and was incorporated into Pope John XXIII’s Encyclical Mater et Magistra (1961). In the encyclical, the Pope indicated “three stages which should normally be followed in the reduction of [the Church’s] social principles into practice”: “First, one reviews the concrete situation; secondly, one forms a judgment on it in the light of these same principles; thirdly, one decides what in the circumstances can and should be done to implement these principles” (ibid. 236).
The importance of this method was emphasized at the Second Vatican Council and has since been widely used in liberation theology and practical theology.
We pray for the guidance of the Holy Spirit so that each of us may be led by the light of the Gospel, starting with small simple daily efforts, and together with many other people, may joyfully build a society that cares for the life given to us by God.
Part I
SEE
SEEING WHAT STATE OUR COMMON HOME IS IN
3Our first step is to «see».
To discern and act, we must start with seeing. The act of «seeing» is not merely an apprehension of facts. It means a heart-moving awareness of reality in God’s loving presence. Thus, the act of «seeing» can also be described as «encountering».
Integral ecology addresses our harmonious relationship with God, others, nature and ourselves, and invites us to see all things as interconnected, affecting each other. Seeing reality in this way is, in other words, a lively encounter with reality, and opens the way to more effective action in dealing with “one complex crisis which is both social and environmental” (LS 139).
In the first half of Part I here below, we will present basic principles for «seeing» (principles for reflection) what we are experiencing in an organized manner: why and how we see it. In the second half, we will present what is happening in our common home and what the specific challenges in Japan are.
We can hardly lead lives without any assumptions, preconceptions, and self-centered desires. Furthermore, the circumstances and causes of problems are complex, and our perceptions are always limited. While acknowledging these limitations, let us move forward in our steps of «seeing», trusting the Lord who works graciously through the Holy Spirit.
Jesus Christ “came to the world not to condemn but to save” (cf. Jn 3:17). When we, united to such a compassionate saving love, address the challenges with “loving concern for humanity’s destiny” (Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, 8), our eyes will be opened to the truth and beauty in God’s creation, to the good efforts of people, and to the holiness within ourselves.
I. SEEING THROUGH THE EYES OF LAUDATO SI’
4As various ecclesiastical documents affirm, the Catholic Church has consistently taught the human dignity of each one of us as a personal being created in the image of God. The Church’s social teaching shows us what our society should be like.
Pope Francis, in his encyclical Laudato Si’, calls the Earth ”our common home“ and encourages us to approach it as a mystery to be contemplated with awe and wonder, rather than merely as a problem to be solved (cf. LS 11, 12).
Thus, each one of us is invited to contemplate the beauty of the Earth, a mystery to be admired, with an active and imaginative gaze.
1 A CONTEMPLATIVE MIND AND AN HONEST LOOK AT THE FACTS
The Inexhaustible Riches of God
- 5 “The universe as a whole, in all its manifold relationships, shows forth the inexhaustible riches of God” (LS 86). When we seek to understand something, we must strive to grasp the various relationships that make it what it is. This integrity emanates from the conviction that God the Creator has made all creatures to be interdependent, complementary, and beneficial to one another.
“We understand better the importance and meaning of each creature if we contemplate it within the entirety of God’s plan.” “The sun and the moon, the cedar and the little flower, the eagle and the sparrow: the spectacle of their countless diversities and inequalities tells us that no creature is self-sufficient” (LS 86).
“When we can see God reflected in all that exists, our hearts are moved to praise the Lord for all his creatures and to worship him in union with them”. When we join our voices and hearts to the Canticle of the Sun composed by St. Francis of Assisi in which “this sentiment finds magnificent expression” (LS 87), we may come to experience the joy and peace of returning to our human nature and an authentically human way of life.
In addition to cultivating a contemplative mind, what is further required of us is honesty — an honesty that sincerely and directly looks at the stark reality that the global environment is being seriously harmed. With both of these two driving forces, that is, a contemplative mind open to mystery and a commitment to scientific truth, Laudato Si’ moves forward, offering a broad overview of the environmental problems affecting our common home.
Laudato Si’ invites us to go beyond the mere amassing of information or intellectual findings, urging us instead to come to a painful awareness. It calls on us to turn these issues at hand into our own personal suffering and to discover what each one of us can do about them (cf. LS 19).
The Wisdom to Protect and Govern the Home
- 6As a matter of course, when we turn our eyes to the global environment, we must rely on “ecology” as a natural science. However, the ecology emphasized by the Catholic Church is “integral ecology,” an ever broader and more all-encompassing ecological approach as described in Laudato Si’.
The term “ecology”, commonly used in environmental thought and ethics, is derived from the ancient Greek word “oikos,” meaning “house” or “household.” Originally, ecology refers to a branch of biology focused on the study of living organisms and their surrounding habitats. Considering this etymological meaning, ecology can be understood as “the wisdom to manage a household and all its resources appropriately,” or more simply, “the wisdom to protect and govern a home.”
The term is now commonly used to describe a lifestyle, a way of thinking, or a movement that is attuned to the natural environment and is therewith closely related to “home economics” or “domestic science.”
The Rules of Nature
- 7Integral ecology is a form of ecology, a study and practice that focuses on the intrinsic economy of life and the environmental conditions that make it possible. It addresses the harmonious relationships with God, with others, with nature, and with one’s own self, while never forgetting the fact that these relationships are interconnected and mutually affecting. The term ‘ecological’ as used in this book is based on the concept of integral ecology mentioned above.
As noted in the Introduction, integral ecology compels us to ask ourselves what order is inscribed in this natural world created by the God of mercy and truth, and consequently what rules of nature we are called to observe.
It also raises the question of what kind of beings we humans are, created as beings of a social nature by the same Creator, and what kind of society we should aspire to. This can be understood as a kind of wisdom that urges us to develop an ever-broader grasp of reality and an ever more thorough embracing of values, both of which are essential for pursuing a more human way of life and collaborating to build a more humane world.
The term “environmental problems” usually refers to various issues regarding natural resources. Yet, if we start from the idea of a harmonious relationship between humans and nature, as proposed by integral ecology, it refers instead to the degradation and deterioration of the environment caused by humans, who were meant to be entrusted with the care of nature in accordance with the order imprinted in it, but who have broken the rules of nature.
In other words, the problem resides precisely in the habitual behaviors of individuals or groups that disrupt the functioning of ecosystems and the intrinsic economy of life, thereby undermining the proper relationship with nature.
Prevention
- 8Not only must we strive to eliminate or alleviate environmental problems, but we also need to prevent new problems from arising. This makes it all the more important to understand as thoroughly as possible, what the natural environment was like before the current environmental problems arose, and what inherent laws of nature must be safeguarded in order for us humans to live in harmony with it. We must therefore keep in mind what should not to be violated and what must be treated with care.
Today, in an age overwhelmed by a flood of information, it is extremely difficult to remain free from the influence of ideological and industrial manipulation, which may also lurk in media reports, unless we make a conscious effort to keep asking ourselves what our authentic stance should be. This is why, “by virtue of our unique dignity and our gift of intelligence, we are called to respect creation and its inherent laws” (LS 69).
Material Cycles
- 9The Earth operates with a system in which water, air, and all other materials circulate, and human life is sustained by these cycles. When extracting resources we need from the Earth, we must not forget that we also produce waste, even at times potentially harmful pollutants included.
Through it is virtually impossible for humans to fully comprehend the working of this mysterious Earth with her 4.6 billion years of history, we must at least recognize that the resources and energy available to us are finite, that nature’s capacity to purify human-generated waste is limited, and that we must use crops, marine products, and other sustenance in ways that do not exceed the Earth’s regenerative capacity.
It can be said that we humans are being called upon by the Earth not to disrupt the material cycles in nature but instead to make the most of them. The following words from the Apostolic Exhortation Laudate Deum (2023), which express this fundamental perspective, are truly worth deep reflection.
Human life, intelligence and freedom are elements of the nature that enriches our planet, part of its internal workings and its equilibrium (LD 26).
Environmental Ethics
- 10Environmental thought, which delves into the relationship between humans and nature from various perspectives, teaches us to see the natural world as a place of communion among diverse forms of life. Environmental ethics encourages us to treat natural things with moderation.
The basic tenets of environmental ethics can be summarized as follows from the perspective of fairness, which raises the issue of whether the ends and results, as well as the means and methods used to achieve them, are ethically acceptable.
- “Intra-generational (synchronic) justice”, which asserts that unjust disparities between people living in the same generation should be eliminated.
- “Inter-generational (diachronic) justice”, which asserts that the basic human needs of future generations should be met.
- “Justice against speciesism”, which asserts that exploitative treatment of non-human species should be eliminated.
We humans can find and value the beauty of order created by the interactions among life-forms. That is why we ask ourselves whether our conduct toward nature is ethically justified or degrading to our own humanity.
2 A MULTIDIMENSIONAL AWARENESS OF THE PROBLEM
A Basic Challenge in Living the Faith
- 11What is important for Christians to consider in addressing environmental issues is how to view them from a Gospel perspective.
As seen in the Creation story telling us of God’s love, which comes before everything and from which all creation arises, human life consists of “relationships with God, with our neighbour and with the earth itself” (LS 66). In living out these three relationships, “how individuals relate to themselves” (LS 141) essentially gains importance as a fourth relationship, uniquely shaping one’s own life as a personal being through a maturing process in the journey of life.
Laudato Si’ first treats the relationship with God, which is the most important for Christians, and mentions that the commitment to environmental issues is also part of the critical responsibility of an act of faith: a basic challenge in living the faith.
Ten Consciousness-raising Topics
- 12Laudato Si’, which consists of six chapters, lists the following ten topics as “a number of themes which will reappear as the Encyclical unfolds” just before the first chapter (cf. LS 16).
(1) The intimate relationship between the poor and the fragility of the planet
(2) The conviction that everything in the world is connected
(3) The critique of new paradigms and forms of power derived from technology
(4) The call to seek other ways of understanding the economy and progress
(5) The value proper to each creature
(6) The human meaning of ecology
(7) The need for forthright and honest debate
(8) The serious responsibility of international and local policy
(9) The throwaway culture
(10) The proposal of a new lifestyle
Hoping to make the multidimensional approach of Laudato Si’ easier to understand, we have reformulated these ten topics into five more concise terms, each combining two of the original topics, as follows.
Poverty and environmental issues as a set of problems with shared roots— (1) and (2)
- 13This is a statement of an ecological understanding of reality that sees all things as being interconnected and mutually interacting, and that any interactive relationships threatening the economy of life must be addressed.
The Pope’s concern that treating things in isolation misses the relationship between them and leads only to ineffective measures that do not solve the underlying problems invites us to dig down to the “roots” of the problem. His appeal to the fact that it is the lives and livelihoods of the poor who will be the first to suffer and will bear the greatest hardship from the degradation of the natural environment is indeed a recognition of reality based on a truly ecological viewpoint.
Poverty and environmental issues are not two separate problems, but a set of problems with the same roots, and so their solution requires a radical approach that reaches down to the root causes underlying particular problems.
The Threat of Technocracy— (3) and (4)
- 14“Politics must not be subject to the economy, nor should the economy be subject to the dictates of an efficiency-driven paradigm of technocracy” (LS 189).
This suggests that the root cause may lie in technocracy, which deifies technological advancement—originally meant to be a glorious fruit of human reason endowed by God—and leaves all the problem-solving to technical manipulation.
This technocracy, which involves economics and politics, fosters excessive anthropocentrism and a rampant culture of “use and throw away” based on a practical relativism that gives “absolute priority to immediate convenience, and all else becomes relative” (cf. LS 122, 123). A kind of “scotosis” (intellectual blindness) prevails there. There is no room for considering that the legitimacy of both the economy and progress depends on due respect for human life as a matter of course, and for non-human life and the ecosystems that sustain human society as well.
A Fittingly Human Responsibility— (5) and (6)
- 15This requires an understanding and practice of human ecology characterized by a healthy humility that accepts our human niche in nature, and a happy sobriety that assumes our human responsibility within the web of life, while respecting the inherent value of all created things.
It also entails the praxis of identifying and enhancing the conditions for one’s own personal perfection while respecting each human person as such. These conditions must enable all human beings, including future generations, to carry out their lives according to their own human nature.
A Forthright Dialogue in the Service of Life— (7) and (8)
- 16“Today, in view of the common good, there is urgent need for politics and economics to enter into a frank dialogue in the service of life, especially human life” (LS 189).
Sound collective decision-making requires cumulative exchanges that foster trust, especially forthright and honest dialogue. In a society where falsification and fabrication of data, concealment and plagiarism are frequently discussed, it is crucial to have responsible and open dialogue and exchange, backed by a clear ethical stance that separates us from such wrongdoings.
From the home to the domestic and foreign affairs of nations, there are no settings where sound collective decision-making need not be pursued.
Breaking Away from the Throwaway Culture— (9) and (10)
- 17A culture that values responsible and open dialogue and exchange has been referred to by several popes as a “culture of dialogue,” and as a “culture of life,” given that dialogue inherently aims toward healthy living and happy fellowship with it.
The current Pope calls for a cultural revolution that aims at breaking away from the “throwaway culture” that unhesitatingly discards things and abandons human persons. He calls for a shift to a “culture of care” in an ecological context that embraces and appreciates all living things along with the environment, including the conditions that support their proper life activities. This cultural transformation cannot occur without germinating, preserving, and nurturing a new lifestyle.
Moreover, “ecological spirituality,” the fountain of wisdom that contributes to building, maintaining, and developing such a lifestyle, can continue to exist as a force to shape history only if there is an “ecological education” that instills the significance of healthy humility and happy sobriety.
3 FUNDAMENTAL CHALLENGES—RENEWING HUMANITY AND ENHANCING THE COMMON GOOD
The Ecological crisis is both a human and a social problem
- 18Since Laudato Si’, Pope Francis has kept on urging people to engage in dialogue across national, religious, and cultural boundaries. He calls on everyone to safeguard the global environment in the run-up to the UN climate summits and the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, as well as through other various opportunities.
There has been an increasingly shared awareness that environmental problems are both human and social problems. What Laudato Si’ clearly demonstrates is an approach that seeks to understand environmental issues through the lens of faith. This faith perspective arises from an ideal vision of how humanity and society should be in relationship with God.
The Inner Renewal of Humanity
- 19 One of the fundamental challenges highlighted in Laudato Si’ is what may be called the “inner renewal of humanity”. Frankly acknowledging that we humans are the origin of the ecological crisis, the Pope stresses that a radical transformation of human behavior is needed and spells out that this cannot be achieved without an inner renewal of humanity. If environmental problems arise from a deviation from an authentic realization of our original human potential, then their resolution requires us to pause, recall our original human way of life and return to it.
It would hardly be helpful to describe symptoms without acknowledging the human origins of the ecological crisis. A certain way of understanding human life and activity has gone awry, to the serious detriment of the world around us. Should we not pause and consider this? At this stage, I propose that we focus on the dominant technocratic paradigm and the place of human beings and of human action in the world (LS 101).
There can be no renewal of our relationship with nature without a renewal of humanity itself. There can be no ecology without an adequate anthropology (LS 118).
This is perhaps the most important message in Laudato Si’: it is our very humanity that is being called into question by the ecological crisis as it manifests itself through environmental problems.
Enhancing the Common Good
- 20The Pope, who has placed Laudato Si’ in the body of the Church’s ”social teaching” (cf. LS 15), takes up the key challenge of a renewal of humanity itself and calls for the basic human rights of each person as an irreplaceable individual to be safeguarded and for the common good to be pursued in order to keep such human rights intact. “Underlying the principle of the common good is respect for the human person as such, endowed with basic and inalienable rights ordered to his or her integral development” (LS 157).
Enhancing the common good, rooted in respect for the dignity of the human person, is the starting point of the Catholic Church’s social teaching. Concern for the fragile natural world is authentic only when it is united with concern for the socially vulnerable.
The human environment and the natural environment deteriorate together; we cannot adequately combat environmental degradation unless we attend to causes related to human and social degradation. In fact, the deterioration of the environment and of society affects the most vulnerable people on the planet (LS 48).
Laudato Si’ describes integral ecology as “inseparable from the notion of the common good, a central and unifying principle of social ethics” (LS 156). The common good, which is “the sum of those conditions of social life which allow social groups and their individual members relatively thorough and ready access to their own fulfilment” (Gaudium et Spe 26, cited in LS 156), is the most important principle for creating a truly human society.
Finally, the common good calls for social peace, the stability and security provided by a certain order which cannot be achieved without particular concern for distributive justice; whenever this is violated, violence always ensues. Society as a whole, and the state in particular, are obliged to defend and promote the common good (LS 157).
This principle of the common good, because it involves a constant concern for distributive justice, “immediately becomes, logically and inevitably, a summons to solidarity and a preferential option for the poorest of our brothers and sisters” (LS 158).
It is even said that sustainable development spoken of apart from intergenerational solidarity is contrary to justice, since the notion of the common good “extends to future generations” (LS 159).
II. THE CRY OF THE EARTH AND THE CRY OF THE POOR
A Call for Changing Our Behavior
- 21In 2020, marking the fifth anniversary of the publication of Laudato Si’, Pope Francis gave strong support to the “Laudato Si’ Week” launched under the auspices of the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development, and called on us to protect the Earth — our common home — and vulnerable people, through prayer and concrete action.
Climate change, in particular, is addressed in Laudato Si’ as follows:
Climate change is a global problem with grave implications: environmental, social, economic, political and for the distribution of goods. It represents one of the principal challenges facing humanity in our day. Its worst impact will probably be felt by developing countries in coming decades. Many of the poor live in areas particularly affected by phenomena related to warming, and their means of subsistence are largely dependent on natural reserves and ecosystemic services such as agriculture, fishing and forestry (LS 25).
In addition, on the feast of St. Francis of Assisi in 2023, Pope Francis promulgated the apostolic exhortation Laudate Deum. In it, he explicitly refers to the crisis caused by climate change and called for even greater urgency in changing our behavior to solve the problem.
Regarding global warming, which is a critical aspect of climate change, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (adopted at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992) along with its Conference of the Parties (COP) has held many discussions for negotiating an international framework for countermeasures. At COP21 in 2015, the Paris Agreement was adopted, setting a common goal of keeping the increase in global average temperature below 2°C above pre-industrial level, making efforts to limit it to 1.5° if possible, and to reduce human-caused global greenhouse gas emissions to virtually zero (carbon neutral) in the latter half of this century.
Unfortunately, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C, published in 2018, warned that if the current trends continued, global temperature could reach the 1.5°C threshold by 2030. To limit global warming to this level, the report emphasized the need to reduce global human-caused CO2 emissions by about 45 % from 2010 levels by 2030. This report also triggered a rapid spread of Climate Emergency Declarations (CED) issued by local governments around the world.
The Climate Crisis as a Human-Caused Problem
- 22The United Nations has stated that climate change today, which is causing many serious disasters and advancing faster than expected, is no longer merely a change but already a crisis. Therefore, the term “climate crisis” is appropriate.
According to the United Nations Information Center web site (created on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the UN)
(2) , there is no corner of the globe immune to the devastating consequences of climate change. Rising temperatures are fueling environmental degradation, natural disasters, weather extremes, food and water insecurity, economic disruption, conflict and terrorism. Sea levels are rising, the Arctic ice is melting, coral reefs are dying, oceans are acidifying, and forests are burning.
For example, glaciers and ice sheets in polar and mountain regions are already melting faster than ever, causing sea levels to rise.
Nearly two-thirds of the world’s cities with populations over five million are located in areas at risk of sea level rise, and nearly 40 % of the global population lives within 100 km of a seacoast.
In addition, disasters linked to climate and weather extremes such as heatwaves, droughts, typhoons and hurricanes are becoming more frequent and intense. Ninety percent of disasters are now classified as weather- and climate-related, costing the world economy $520 billion each year, while 26 million people are being pushed into poverty as a result.
In 2021, the Working Group I contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report
(3) clearly showed that the global surface temperature in 2011-2020 was 1.09 °C higher than 1850-1900, and that it is undoubtedly an aspect of climate crisis that is human-caused. In response, the Glasgow Climate Pact, adopted by COP26, led the international community to “[resolve] to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C.”
(4)
1 THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF WEALTHY COUNTRIES
Widening the Economic Gap
- 23In Laudate Deum, Pope Francis also warned against the rapid increase in greenhouse gas emissions, based on scientific evidence such as the IPCC report. Describing this situation as “a global social issue and one intimately related to the dignity of human life” (LD 3), he quotes the following passage from a document issued by United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.
Our care for one another and our care for the earth are intimately bound together. Climate change is one of the principal challenges facing society and the global community. The effects of climate change are borne by the most vulnerable people, whether at home or around the world (LD 3).
The UN notes that global warming affects food and water security for all, disproportionately impacting the poor and vulnerable, and increasing the likelihood of further widening the economic gap between the world’s richest and poorest countries.
“Climate change increases the factors that put and keep people in poverty. Floods may sweep away urban slums, destroying homes and livelihoods. Heat can make it difficult to work in outdoor jobs. Water scarcity may affect crops. Over the past decade (2010 – 2019), weather-related events displaced an estimated 23.1 million people on average each year, leaving many more vulnerable to poverty. Most refugees come from countries that are most vulnerable and least ready to adapt to the impacts of climate change.”
(5)
Ecological Debt
- 24If we are serious about tackling the issue of the disparity between richer and poorer countries, we must have a clear understanding of “ecological debt”. We must now consider once again which side, either the richer or the poorer, incurs debt, and on which side the obligation to pay off lies.
A true “ecological debt” exists, particularly between the global north and south, connected to commercial imbalances with effects on the environment, and the disproportionate use of natural resources by certain countries over long periods of time. …The warming caused by huge consumption on the part of some rich countries has repercussions on the poorest areas of the world, especially Africa, where a rise in temperature, together with drought, has proved devastating for farming. There is also the damage caused by the export of solid waste and toxic liquids to developing countries, and by the pollution produced by companies which operate in less developed countries in ways they could never do at home, in the countries in which they raise their capital (LS 51).
When we think of debt, what usually comes to mind is the money that poorer countries borrow from richer ones, which refers to foreign monetary debt. Ecological debt, however, is not an economic debt, but rather refers to a debt with respect to natural resources and the natural environment. Many developed countries owe their economic prosperity to the poorer countries rich in natural resources, which they have achieved by making use of the latter’s natural environment and resources. In other words, in ecological debt, the borrower-lender relationship between countries is the reverse of the relationship in international monetary debt.
How should these debts be paid off?
In different ways, developing countries, where the most important reserves of the biosphere are found, continue to fuel the development of richer countries at the cost of their own present and future. The land of the southern poor is rich and mostly unpolluted, yet access to ownership of goods and resources for meeting vital needs is inhibited by a system of commercial relations and ownership which is structurally perverse. The developed countries ought to help pay this debt by significantly limiting their consumption of non-renewable energy and by assisting poorer countries to support policies and programmes of sustainable development (LS 52).
This makes us wonder just what it really means for a country to be called rich or poor. Even if a poor country blessed with natural resources but still undeveloped in modern industry, owes a debt to a rich country, the richer country getting benefits from natural resources of the poorer also owes a debt to the latter. Therefore, richer countries should use their wealth to pay off their debts to poorer countries.
2 TYPICAL ECOLOGICAL ISSUES IN JAPAN
Ecological Rather Than Environmental Issues
- 25Today, climate change and global warming are widely spoken of as if they were synonymous with the environmental problem. However, environmental problems are multifaceted with complex and diverse causes.
The list goes on and on: nature conservation issues related to the preservation and restoration of forests, green spaces, rivers, etc. and the protection of living creatures; global environmental issues such as CFC emissions, deforestation, desertification, acid rain, transboundary movement of toxic waste, global warming and climate change, biodiversity loss, ocean plastic waste problems, large-scale logging of tropical rainforests and massive food waste; pollution and waste problems caused by chemical substances and endocrine disruptors as well, biological contamination included; and energy and resource issues and so forth. These are far too numerous to enumerate exhaustively.
On the other hand, when degradation or deterioration of the natural environment interferes with the inherent operation of ecosystems supporting the intrinsic economy of life, that is, when the relationship between living organisms (biological activities) and their habitats (necessary conditions for life) becomes dysfunctional, it ought to be tackled as an ecological problem. After all the environmental crisis represented by the climate crisis, is essentially an ecological crisis that cannot be properly addressed without an ecology in depth that reexamines our lifestyles and our current social systems from their very foundations.
It is the natural environment of the Earth and all the living things in it that are injured and harmed by environmental problems. We must not forget that it is the socially vulnerable who will suffer the most serious consequences before anyone else.
Pollution as an Ecological Problem
- 26Japan ought to be a country that clearly understands the weight and significance of such issues more deeply than any other, having undergone profound pains and sufferings through serious historic pollution-related tragedies.
It was more than half a century ago that environmental issues became widely recognized in Japanese society. In particular, the four major pollution-related diseases — Minamata disease and Niigata Minamata disease (both caused by methylmercury contamination), Yokkaichi asthma (due to air pollution from sulfur oxides), and Itai-itai disease (caused by cadmium contamination)—inflicted enormous damage on both people and nature.
Although opportunities to reflect on these pollution-related tragedies during Japan’s period of rapid economic growth are becoming rarer, it cannot be said that the problem of pollution has been solved. In what follows, we will consider Minamata disease.
Outcome of Giving Economic Development Top Priority
- 27Minamata disease is a toxic disorder of the central nervous system, whose main symptoms include sensory disturbances in limbs, ataxia, and concentric contraction of the visual field. It was officially confirmed as a pollution-related disease in 1956. The disease was caused by the consumption of fish and shellfish contaminated with methylmercury, a highly toxic form of organic mercury. This substance had accumulated biologically after being discharged as untreated industrial wastewater into Minamata Bay by the Chisso Corporation.
Methylmercury was also transmitted from the mother’s womb to the fetuses via the placenta, resulting in speech, cognitive, growth, and motor impairments in some children. This condition is known as congenital or fetal Minamata disease.
In addition, from around 1964, similar symptoms began to appear among residents living downstream along the Agano River in Niigata Prefecture. This case is known as Minamata Disease Type II or Niigata Minamata Disease.
It goes without saying that this pollution-related disease was a typical problem of Japan’s period of rapid economic growth, during which economic development was given top priority often at the expense of rural areas and socially vulnerable populations.
Discrimination: Personal, Public, Structural
- 28The Minamata problem involves more than just pollution. It has also been pointed out that personal discrimination (violence, slander, exclusion, and avoidance among individuals), public discrimination (violence, inequality, and unfair treatment by public authorities and institutions), and structural discrimination (embedded in systems, laws, norms, and values) both inside and outside of Minamata, led to the breakdown of families and communities, the severing of bonds between people, and the destruction of the social fabric.
“The pollution causing Minamata Disease did not end there, its impact extended beyond, as Japan prioritized economic growth and industrial development at the cost of the vulnerable and rural areas. Therefore, it is more accurate to say that society and the world can be better understood through individual incidents, individual patients and those connected to them, and the various experiences related to Minamata disease or life in Minamata” (Masanori Hanada, “Minamatagaku Kenkyū no Kadai to Minamatabyōjiken no genzai,” Kumamotogakuen Daigaku Minamatagaku Kenkyūsentā, Minamatagaku Kenkyū, [Issues in Minamata Studies and the Present State of Minamata Disease Incident,” Kumamoto Gakuen University Minamata Studies Center, Minamata Studies], No. 11, March 2002, p. 44, (translator’s translation).
As stated above, the disastrous problem of Minamata pollution does not merely consist in the fact that industrial activities have severely damaged nature and the socially vulnerable. It continues to serve as an opportunity for us to reflect on various aspects of the rupture of human relationships, such as discriminatory attitudes, prejudice, and indifference toward others.
Nuclear Power as an Ecological Problem
- 29When we live in Japan and talk about environmental issues, we cannot avoid mentioning the issue of nuclear power plants.
The accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake in March 2011, deprived many residents of their homes and jobs, as well as their connections to local people, traditions, and nature. This loss disrupted the economy of life crucial to human existence, and their human dignity as personal beings. The hardship of living in evacuation shelters and the fear of radiation exposure caused mental health issues and the pain of loneliness. Additionally, differences in people’s circumstances led to conflicts, divisions, and discrimination.
The situation at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant remains critical, without any prospects for dealing with the melted nuclear fuel debris and persistently high radiation levels in the surrounding area. There are also growing concerns about government policies, particularly regarding the disposal of contaminated soil and other materials generated by decontamination efforts, as well as the release of treated wastewater containing radioactive substances into the ocean.
We, the Catholic Bishops of Japan, recognizing the ecological crisis caused by this extensive human-made environmental destruction, have issued two messages: “Abolish Nuclear Plants Immediately ~Facing The Tragedy of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Disaster~” (November 8, 2011)
(6) and “On the Abolition of Nuclear Power Generation: A Call by the Catholic Church in Japan ― Five and a Half Years after the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Disaster” (November 11, 2004)
(7).
A Source of Pollution Unconnected to Recycling
- 30In Part I.1, titled “A Contemplative Mind and an Honest Look at the Facts”, we discussed the idea that all existence on Earth, including human beings, is part of a cycle. It is our responsibility to maintain the integrity of this cycle that connects all living things.
Japan’s nuclear energy policy emphasizes the importance of the nuclear fuel cycle. The Agency for Natural Resources and Energy within the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) publicized the Annual Report on Energy for FY2021 (Japan’s Energy White Paper 2022)
(8), which refers to radioactive waste accumulated across Japan, including approximately 19,000 tons of spent fuel. (cf. part.3, ch.4, sec.1: Japanese original, p.191). This waste must be stored underground for 100,000 years, and due to Japan’s frequent seismic activity, finding a suitable disposal site is considered an extremely challenging task.
The production of the vast amounts of nuclear energy released through the fission of atomic nuclei is indeed unconnected to recycling. In reality, this process generates large quantities of pollutants that cannot be returned to their original state or stored safely. This bequeaths to future generations a noxious legacy of radioactive materials that are hazardous and difficult to manage. This is undeniably a “source of pollution”.
The use of nuclear power continues to cause environmental pollution and exposure in the areas where the uranium is mined. Nuclear power policies worldwide need to be assessed from an ethical standpoint as well. The Japanese government has recently reversed its earlier stance of reducing dependence on nuclear power generation. It is now promoting the use of nuclear energy once again, which has raised concerns among the Japanese public. We must discern whether it makes sense to hasten the restart of nuclear power plants, extend the operational lifespan of aging nuclear facilities, and expedite the construction of new nuclear power plants.
Radiation Exposure as a Form of “Pollution”
- 31Furthermore, the creation of nuclear weapons is a “source of pollution” that, during its production process, can severely damage the natural environment and expose many vulnerable people to radiation.
The nuclear tests conducted worldwide during the second half of the 20th century contaminated both land and sea, exposing nearby residents and facility workers to harmful radiation. In fact, it could be argued that the entire planet was exposed to radiation due to these repeated tests. In Japan, the anti-nuclear movement was ignited by the Daigo Fukuryu Maru incident in 1954. Nuclear tests produce environmental pollution with serious life-threatening effects.
In his 1963 encyclical Pacem in Terris, John XXIII declared that nuclear weapons do not serve as a deterrent; instead, they only create anxiety in the world. Pope Francis also emphasized this during his visit to Japan in 2019. The church in Japan ought to play a vital role in conveying the message of abolishing nuclear powerplants, a message gained through the experience of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident, while standing in solidarity with those advocating for a world free of nuclear weapons.
To prevent the further spread of contamination and destruction of both the natural world and human society caused by radiation, we are called to cultivate appropriate environmental awareness, that is, care for the environment that fosters care for life.
The Military Base Issue as an Ecological Problem
- 32The nuclear weapons often overshadow concerns regarding the protection of human life and the natural environment in the pursuit of military objectives, particularly in the context of winning wars. War is one of the leading causes of environmental destruction. In modern Japan, the issues of military affairs and the environment, as well as the related issues of public discrimination and human rights, are especially acute in the context of the ecological crises brought forth by military bases.
Let us look at the issues confronting Okinawa Island, particularly the concerns regarding environmental deterioration linked to military activities.
Approximately 70% of US military facilities and sites in Japan are in Okinawa Prefecture. On Okinawa Island, which is home to over 90% of the prefecture’s population, military installations occupy about 15% of the land area. The presence of US military facilities causes anxiety among residents due to various incidents and accidents involving soldiers and military personnel. Concerns also arise from noise and exhaust emissions produced by fighter jets, offensive odors, and the pollution of water and soil caused by hazardous substances leaking from the base and aircraft. Furthermore, training exercises, such as live-fire exercises, have a detrimental impact on the natural environment. As a result, a continuous stream of complaints from the residents has persisted.
Nevertheless, in the event of incidents or accidents caused by US military bases, the US military is not obligated to restore the situation to its original state under the U.S.-Japan Status of Forces Agreement (signed in 1960), which is based on the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between Japan and the United States of America. Furthermore, restrictions on access to the bases prevent the Japanese authorities from conducting investigations into these incidents or accidents.
The Yanbaru region, which includes the Northern Training Area of the U.S. military, is rich in rare wildlife, including the Okinawa rail and the Okinawa woodpecker. The area around Henoko, on the east coast of Okinawa Island, which has been proposed as an alternative site for the return of Futenma Air Base, is home to a diverse array of living creatures. Reclamation work using a large amount of sand has begun there, effectively carried out by proxy for the national government. The impact of the construction on local wildlife and its effects on the living conditions of residents, continues to be a subject of contention between those opposing the base’s construction and the Japanese government.
Also, in the areas surrounding the Kadena and Futenma Military Bases, as well as Camp Hansen in Kin Town, there have been incidents of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination of drinking water and agricultural products. These toxic substances are suspected to have originated from foam fire extinguishing chemicals that leaked from the bases, raising concerns about the health of residents.
Imposition of Divisive Burdens
- 33The legitimacy of Japan, whose fundamental norm is pacifism (cf. the preamble and Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution), while allowing the long-term establishment of foreign military bases, must indeed be questioned. Nevertheless, for us, the core of the current Okinawa base issue lies in the fact that the public burden arising from the larger issue of security for Japan and Asia is being unilaterally imposed on the people of Okinawa.
Many of these bases were built by forcibly confiscating the land of residents due to historical circumstances. They are far from the center of the “mainland” and continue to divide people over vested interests, much like nuclear power plants.
In the performance of their duties at US military bases, the operational priorities of the US military take precedence over all else. As a result, even when accidents or incidents occur, the human rights of individuals are often overlooked. The Japanese government and other administrative bodies have not taken any active steps to address this situation.
A Crisis in Democracy and Local Autonomy
- 34The people of Okinawa have consistently expressed their desire through democratic processes, such as elections and referendums, indicating that they do not want to continue bearing the burden of hosting U.S. military bases. However, the Japanese government has suppressed these voices, as if to imply that it is acceptable to make Okinawa endure unreasonable demands at any cost for the sake of national policy and interest. This situation highlights a crisis in democracy and local autonomy in Japan.
Many Okinawans believe that their current situation has its roots in the “Ryukyu Disposition” of 1872, which led to the abolition of the Ryukyu Kingdom and the establishment of Okinawa Prefecture in 1879. After the Battle of Okinawa at the end of the Pacific War, in which approximately one in four citizens of the prefecture lost their lives, Okinawa came under the control of the US military. The Japanese government, treating Okinawa as Japanese territory but as if it were beyond the reach of government authority, tolerated Okinawa’s burdensome position. Despite the return of administrative rights to Japan in 1972, Okinawa continues to bear a disproportionate burden due to the ongoing presence of US military bases.
Thus, Okinawa has been used as a tool in political negotiation. Historically, the Japanese government’s colonial attitude towards Okinawa has caused significant suffering for its people.
Okinawa’s culture emphasizes the importance of human solidarity, as illustrated by the Okinawan dialect term “yuimaru”, which means “to help each other” and “to prosper together”. Unfortunately, the people of Okinawa are still being forced to confront challenges due to military bases that damage the environment as well as undermine human dignity and community bonds. It is essential for all of us living in Japan to tackle this situation as soon as possible.
The Need for a Broader Vision
- 35We have identified three key ecological problems in Japan: pollution, nuclear power plants, and military bases. It is crucial to recognize that each of these is a complex and multifaceted structural problem involving living beings and the environment.
Furthermore, a sincere engagement with ecological problems like these is also a challenging aspect of integral ecology that calls on us to question our entire way of life, including the way we participate in society, the economy, and politics. What is required is a “broader vision” (LS 138, 159) that enables us to take actions appropriate to realities, not leaving things to others, but taking one’s own responsibility. Indeed, what is called for is “love for society and commitment to the common good” (LS 231).
The Church calls the civilization shaped by responsible citizenship born of an awareness of one’s own human nature with personal dignity the “civilization of love.”
Social love is the key to authentic development: “In order to make society more human, more worthy of the human person, love in social life – political, economic and cultural – must be given renewed value, becoming the constant and highest norm for all activity”. In this framework, along with the importance of little everyday gestures, social love moves us to devise larger strategies to halt environmental degradation and to encourage a “culture of care” which permeates all of society (LS 231).
3 TOWARDS CHANGING OUR LIFESTYLES
A Change in Lifestyle
- 36In the previous section, we have given an overview of some of the ecological problems in Japan, including climate change, in the broadest sense, emphasizing that we must address these issues in order to safeguard the rich interaction of all life. Such problems urge us to delve into the human roots of the ecological crisis.
Now, how can we tackle these ecological problems?
This will require “a change in lifestyle” as Pope Francis has called for. In addition to an understanding of the laws of nature as already mentioned, a structural understanding of the causes of environmental problems is necessary to help each of us focus on what we need to do in order to make a change in lifestyle.
Small Acts of Care for the Environment
- 37When dealing with climate change, the reduction of emissions of carbon dioxide as the main greenhouse gas is imperative, and therefore the shift to carbon-free renewable energy is a key topic of discussion. While this shift is certainly urgent and essential, the causes of environmental problems are complex, and focusing solely on the energy issue will not take us very far.
For example, the oceans, which cover 70 % of the Earth’s surface area, lose their ability to absorb carbon dioxide when they are polluted. To keep the oceans clean, it is essential not merely to solve the plastic waste problem, but to take responsibility for domestic wastewater itself. In fact, 60 % of water pollution in Japan stems from domestic wastewater.
Likewise, deforestation reduces carbon dioxide absorption, so efforts to preserve and expand green spaces are highly effective in combatting global warming.
In other words, water and greenery are carbon dioxide sinks. Therefore, any action that helps protect the natural environment also contributes to preventing global warming. It is important to understand the laws of nature for sustaining the functioning of sound ecosystems and the activities of a healthy life and make small, daily acts of care for the environment in our everyday lives.
A Structural Approach to Problems
- 38Understanding the structural causes of environmental problems helps us to grasp their essential nature.
It is often said that the main cause of environmental problems lies in the structure of mass production, mass consumption, and mass disposal. This sequence of human activities exceeds nature’s capacity to detoxify and regenerate itself, and interferes with the material cycle, which works according to the laws of nature.
The serious pollution problems of Japan, too, are a typical example of environmental problems brought about by such a series of structures of pollution and waste.
Throwaway Culture
- 39Laudato Si’ provides an overview of environmental problems through the lens of pollution, waste, and throwaway culture, beginning with the issue of air pollution, which poses health risks especially to the poor. It points out that the paradigm or the principle of efficiency driving human activities prioritizes economic efficiency over the intrinsic value of people and nature, leading to repeated pollution and waste disposal, without considering the impact on ecosystems. The encyclical sounds a warning that the mass of the socially vulnerable people is being excluded and thrown away.
These problems are closely linked to a throwaway culture which affects the excluded just as it quickly reduces things to rubbish. To cite one example, most of the paper we produce is thrown away and not recycled. It is hard for us to accept that the way natural ecosystems work is exemplary (LS 22).
Mass Production, Mass Consumption, and Mass Disposal in “Fast Fashion”
- 40To understand the structure of mass production, mass consumption, and mass disposal as a coherent whole, it is essential to carefully observe the “product life cycle,” which begins with the procurement of raw materials from the natural world, goes through production, consumption, and disposal, and eventually returns to the natural world. At the same time, we must also consider both industry-related matters and the “mutual relationship” between producers and consumers, who influence one another.
This means reflecting on the entire structure surrounding the familiar items we consume in our daily lives — food, clothing, and shelter: where the raw materials are procured, how they are manufactured and processed into products, how they are consumed as commodities, and how they are discarded once they have been deemed useless.
As an example, let us consider a typical personal item: clothing.
In recent years, the business model known as “fast fashion” has expanded globally and shown strong sales performance. Fast fashion encourages consumers to purchase clothing frequently by offering mass-produced items at low prices. Since consumption and disposal are two sides of the same coin, frequent purchase, mass consumption, inevitably leads to mass disposal. In this sense, clothing vividly illustrates the structure of mass production, mass consumption, and mass disposal.
Structural Violence Against Indigenous People
- 41Such a life cycle of fast fashion clothing provides an example for examining the structural roots of various environmental problems.
The mass production of clothing often leads to over-exploitation of tropical rainforests through large-scale logging because of the need to secure vast amounts of cotton, its basic raw material. Even the processes of cultivation, procurement, manufacturing, and finishing require significant water resources, often drying up nearby water sources as well as becoming a source of water pollution due to dyes. In addition, production sites are typically located in the poorest countries where labor costs are low, and labor opportunities are often provided under quite inadequate conditions.
In other words, mass production in collusion with sales strategies enabled by aggressive cost cutting constitutes a form of human activity that continues to place a heavy burden on both nature and the population of developing countries. We must not overlook this.
It has been pointed out that the procurement of large amounts of resources, not only raw materials for clothing, but also mineral resources used in smartphones and household electric appliances, palm oil for cosmetics and processed foods, soybeans and corn for livestock feed, and timber for construction and other uses, involves large-scale deforestation of tropical rainforests.
Pope Francis has addressed the problem and sounded the alarm in his Apostolic Exhortation Querida Amazonia (2020) (cf. QA 9-13). Large-scale logging often results in the destruction of habitats and ecosystem on which indigenous peoples living in the rainforest depend, leading to forced migration and displacement.
In other words, mass production not merely treats the natural world as a mere reservoir of raw materials, but also constitutes structural violence against the cultural and spiritual wealth of indigenous peoples, who have preserved a vibrant, life-nurturing relationship with the land.
A Culture of Care
- 42The Pope also calls on consumers to recognize their social responsibility, noting that “purchasing is always a moral and not simply economic act” (LS 206).
In order to make a conversion of heart and develop a more ecological lifestyle, the first step should be to realize that we are living within a structure that is dominated by the throwaway culture of an overly consumerist society that generates various problems, the seriousness of which can be truly called a crisis.
A change in policy by governments and industries is absolutely necessary for humankind to change its behavior. At the same time, however, it is impossible to cultivate a “culture of care” with an ecologically minded broad vision unless the value consciousness of each individual in society is transformed (cf. LD 70).
The word “lifestyle” appears twenty-three times in the text of Laudato Si’ (Japanese version). Lifestyle transformation requires an awareness or a realization that our irresponsible behavior places burdens on and negatively impacts the natural world and socially vulnerable people. It also requires a reexamination of overconsumption and excessive disposal through an understanding of the pollution, waste, and throwaway culture that expose the essence of environmental problems.
A Decarbonized Society
- 43Both the world and Japan are aiming to achieve a decarbonized society by 2050. In Japan, the Climate Change Adaptation Act was enacted in 2018 and in 2020, a carbon neutrality declaration was made, aiming to reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050.
It is clear that drastic changes such as a shift to renewable energy, protection of the marine environment, and promotion of resource recycling are indispensable everywhere to achieve decarbonization and the Paris Agreement targets. It is also scientifically evident that significant reductions in CO2 emissions will be required at the individual level as well.
In response, the Japanese government, under the leadership of the Ministry of the Environment, has launched a national movement named “Decokatsu”— new and prosperous lifestyles leading to decarbonization —, combining “DE[CARBONIZATION]”, “ECO”, and “Katsu” (the Japanese word for activity and lifestyle). In addition, an initiative for lifestyle transformation, called “Zero Carbon Action 30”, has been introduced to promote ecological practices in daily life throughout the country.
Ethical Consumption
- 44As mentioned above, in the fashion industry, it is essential to pursue and realize a sustainable operation that considers the environmental impact across the entire life cycle of clothing, from production and use to disposal.
The Ministry of the Environment and the Consumer Affairs Agency are promoting “sustainable fashion” by encouraging both producers and consumers to take the initiative from their respective standpoints. They aim to shift the industrial structure from a one-way (linear) model of mass production, mass consumption, and mass disposal to a recycling (circular) model that reduces waste through appropriate production, responsible purchase, and recycling.
In addition, the Fashion Industry Charter for Climate Action was released in 2018, and the signatory companies have begun working together to reduce their carbon footprints under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Secretariat.
The Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), an international certification system, has also become widely known for its work on the issue of over-exploitation of tropical rainforests. In addition to such environmental initiatives by corporations, ethical consumption in which consumers choose products that have been treated with ethical responsibility throughout their entire life cycle from raw material procurement to disposal, is also needed.
The Quest to Protect All Life
- 45We must stand in solidarity with efforts at various levels, not only within the churches, but also with these national-level actions and various activities of local communities. Let us not be deterred by the structural stubbornness of the problem but instead join the flock of people of goodwill who willingly fulfill their social responsibilities.
There are many global citizens who continue to lead lives of caring for our common home and develop initiatives in service of caring for the earth. How wonderful it would be if we could join with them and be guided by them on this quest to “protect all life” in patience and hope, contemplating the heart of our Creator, who is abundant in mercy and truth.
Part II
DISCERN
DISCERNING IN THE LIGHT OF FAITH
- 46«Discerning» is to inquire about the Divine Will, to keep it in one’s heart, and to choose a way of life that resonates with it.
Let us ponder where the Divine Will is in the current state of the world and what the world is meant to be from the perspective of faith. What should be a core value in our lives? What values are we invited to live by?
To know the Divine Will, it is necessary to open one’s mind and heart in prayer and seek the way, with the guidance of the Divine Word (Scriptures), ecclesiastical documents such as those of popes and others, the wisdom of various religions and cultures, and conversations in the Spirit with others. To this end, it is important to have times of silence for meditation and contemplation.
Furthermore, the grace of conversion, which gives direction for judgments and choices, involves the purification and reconciliation of the heart. Discernment is a kind of journey within the communion of Divine love.
Discernment is neither a one-time event, nor something to be done only on special occasions: for the believer, it is to be a daily practice and a normal process. Moving forward with a discerning attitude, looking back on the steps already taken, and through repeated courses of adjustment and conversion, we, as followers of Christ, become “the salt of the earth and the light of the world” (cf. Mt 5).
It is vitally important to make use of such a discerning process both as individuals and as a community.
In Part II here below, in search of guidance for «discerning» (criteria for judgment), we will explore the Will of God the Creator revealed in the Bible and review our responsibility as creatures of God to protect and cultivate the created world. We will then present the main points of the Church’s basic stance in facing the ecological crisis.
I. THE DIVINE WORD SHEDDING LIGHT ON THE SIGNS OF THE TIMES
- 47To safeguard our planet Earth, we must recognize how far apart the actions we must take now are from our present economic, social, and cultural systems.
The Church has “the duty of scrutinizing the signs of the times and of interpreting them in the light of the Gospel”(Gaudium et Spes 4). We must discern, through prayer, what is in accordance with God’s will and what is contrary to it.
The ecological crisis we are facing today is indeed one of the signs of the times.
A sign of the times is also a call and an opportunity to open up a new path toward overcoming the crisis. It can be a space that encourages serious questioning, thoughtful reflection, and open dialogue.
Christians are called to interpret it in the light of the Gospel and to discern the proper way to respond.
1 THE HEART OF GOD THE CREATOR
Everything is a Gift of God’s Love
- 48Laudato Si’ refers to biblical wisdom as an invitation to “realize that their (Christians’) responsibility within creation, and their duty towards nature and the Creator, are an essential part of their faith”(Pope John Paul II, “Message for the Celebration of the World Day of Peace in 1990”, cited in LS 64).
All life comes from God, who is love itself. “God is love” (I Jn 4:16). All things in heaven and on earth, — the heavenly bodies, all the plants and animals, and especially human beings, made in the image of God the Creator— are gifts of that love. “The earth is the Lord’s and all it holds, the world and those who dwell in it.”(Ps 24:1); “[H]e who gives to everyone life and breath and everything, … made from one the whole human race to dwell on the entire surface of the earth, and he fixed the ordered seasons and the boundaries of their regions” (Acts 17:25-26). God’s love is the driving force that animates all things that have been created, and the created world is governed by the order of love.
Indeed, “The earth is full of the mercy of the Lord” (Ps 33:5). “The Lord is good to all, compassionate toward all your works” (Ibid. 145:9).
The True Meaning of “Dominion Over All”
- 49Human beings, “made in the image and likeness of God” (cf. Gen 1:26), were given by God a task to “subdue” (Gen 1:28) the earth and to “cultivate and care for it” (Gen 2:15).
In modern times, the biblical phrase, “Let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, the tame animals, all the wild animals, and all the creatures that crawl on the earth” (Gen 1:26), has often been interpreted to mean that humans can dominate and exploit nature through science and technology. This has led to the misconception that Christianity and its Bible are the root cause of environmental problems.
However, the dominion entrusted to humans by God is to take care of the living creatures and fulfill their role as those who are to “cultivate and care for” (Gen 2:15) the earth that nurtures life. The intrinsic purpose of God’s creation is for the world to become a “house of life” through the works of human beings, creatures made in the image and likeness of God, participating in communion with God the Creator.
In Christianity, the term “stewardship” often refers to the responsibility of human beings to serve as good caretakers or stewards of creation. Generally, stewardship refers to the management of property or resources that have been entrusted to us. For Christians, being a good steward of creation involves recognizing the divine love of God the Creator and the intrinsic purpose of God’s creation as well as sharing the gift of God’s love with all creatures on earth in imitation of Jesus.
Praise the Divine Work of Creation
- 50“You visit the earth and water it, make it abundantly fertile. God’s stream is filled with water; you supply their grain. Thus do you prepare it: you drench its plowed furrows, and level its ridges. With showers you keep it soft, blessing its young sprouts. … The pastures are clothed with flocks, the valleys blanketed with grain; they cheer and sing for joy” (Ps 65:10-14). God blesses us with the joy of living through the abundance of crops, livestock, and seafood, which we receive through our labors to nourish ourselves.
Therefore, the psalmist sings praises to God the Creator in many different ways.
Praise him [the Lord], sun and moon; praise him, all shining stars. Praise him, highest heavens, you waters above the heavens. Let them all praise the Lord’s name; for he commanded and they were created (Ps 148:3-5).
Jesus and the Work of Creation
- 51Laudato Si’ states that Jesus urged his disciples “to recognize the paternal relationship God has with all his creatures” (LS 96). During his time on earth, Jesus engaged with nature with a gaze full of affection and wonder, speaking of the Father’s loving sustenance of creatures.
Look at the birds in the sky; they do not sow or reap, they gather nothing into barns, yet your heavenly Father feeds them (Mt 6:26).
And “I am the good shepherd. A good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. … They will hear my voice, and there will be one flock, one shepherd” (Jn 10:11, 16). As these words show, Jesus offers both bodily and spiritual healing, leading to liberation and freedom. He reveals the divine work of God’s creation, saying, “My Father is at work until now, so I am at work” (Jn 5:17).
Living in harmony with the created world, Jesus lovingly spoke of wildflowers (Mt 6:28-30), flowers (Lk 12:27-28), fields of grain (Mt 12:1), vineyards (Mt 20:1), vines (Jn 15:1) and so forth. Jesus led a simple life, relying on the mercy of his heavenly Father each day. Laudato Si’ emphasizes that the human labor Jesus sanctified holds particular significance for human growth (cf. LS 98).
Creation as a Divine Act and the Universe as Created Reality
- 52The New Testament emphasizes that “all things were created through him and for him” (Col 1:16). This statement highlights the fact that the beginning and the future of all creation are deeply connected to the mystery of Christ.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came to be through him, and without him nothing came to be. What came to be through him was life, and this life was the light of the human race (Jn 1:1-4).
John the Evangelist invites us to contemplate the relationship between creation as the divine act and Jesus Christ as the Divine Word (Logos). This divine word continues to work in the universe of nature, ensuring that “God may be all in all” (I Cor 15:28).
The Mystery of Christ Penetrating the Universe
- 53As suggested by the subtitle of Laudato Si’, “care for our common home,” ecology is the wisdom of safeguarding our oikos (home/house). The word “economy”, sharing the same root, refers to the wisdom of managing that oikos (home/house). Consequently, the early Christians referred to the entire history of God’s salvation of His oikos (home/house) as “oikonomia” and believed that God would ultimately guide His benevolent act of creation to completion.
Inheriting this outlook, Laudato Si’ emphasizes that the universe is an expression of God’s love, that the world is a place to encounter God, that sin is the disruption of the inherent harmony of creation, that every creature is a gift from God to be protected by humans, that all creation is directed toward God, and that the mystery of Christ works as a driving force that penetrates the whole universe and directs it toward completion.
During our Eucharistic celebration, especially in the Eucharistic Prayer IV, we are given a vision of the history of salvation that begins with creation:
You are the one God living and true,
existing before all ages and abiding for all eternity,
dwelling in unapproachable light;
yet you, who alone are good, the source of life,
have made all that is,
so that you might fill your creatures with blessings
and bring joy to many of them by the glory of your light.
…
We give you praise, Father most holy,
for you are great
and you have fashioned all your works
in wisdom and in love.
You formed man in your own image
and entrusted the whole world to his care,
so that in serving you alone, the Creator,
he might have dominion over all creatures.
And when through disobedience he had lost your friendship,
you did not abandon him to the domain of death.
For you came in mercy to the aid of all,
so that those who seek might find you.
Time and again you offered them covenants
and through the prophets
taught them to look forward to salvation.
And you so loved the world, Father most holy,
that in the fullness of time
you sent your Only Begotten Son to be our Savior.
Made incarnate by the Holy Spirit
and born of the Virgin Mary,
he shared our human nature in all things
but sin.
To the poor he proclaimed the good news of salvation,
to prisoners, freedom,
and to the sorrowful of heart, joy.
To accomplish your plan,
he gave himself up to death,
and, rising from the dead, he destroyed death
and restored life.
And that we might live no longer for ourselves
but for him who died and rose again for us,
he sent the Holy Spirit from you, Father,
as the first fruits for those who believe,
so that, bringing to perfection his work in the world,
he might sanctify creation to the full.
2 HUMAN RESPONSIBILITY
Sin Consists in Disturbing the Harmony of Creation
- 54Pope Francis, on the other hand, emphasizes human responsibility for the environmental destruction occurring before our eyes (cf. LS, Chapter 3).
The Second Vatican Council had already stated: “Although he was made by God in a state of holiness, from the very onset of his history man abused his liberty, at the urging of the Evil One. Man set himself against God and sought to attain his goal apart from God. … Often refusing to acknowledge God as his beginning, man has disrupted also his proper relationship to his own ultimate goal as well as his whole relationship toward himself and others and all created things” (Gaudium et Spes, 13).
As mentioned above, Laudato Si’ views the disturbance in the harmony between the Creator, humanity, and all of creation as a result of the breakdown in our relationships with God, with each other, with creation, and with ourselves (cf. LS 10, 66, 210). Humanity refuses to acknowledge its limitations as a creature and attempts to replace God.
The Bible views humanity as being in a state where it is unable fulfill its desires for justice and peace due to the sin that originated from the statement, “when you eat of it your eyes will be opened and you will be like gods, who know good and evil” (Gen 3:5). The stories of Cain and Abel’s fratricide (Ibid. 4), Noah’s Ark (Ibid. 6-9), and the Tower of Babel (Ibid.11) all refer to it.
“[O]ur situation today, where sin is manifest in all its destructive power in wars, the various forms of violence and abuse, the abandonment of the most vulnerable, and attacks on nature” (LS 66) is also the result of such a disruption of harmony.
Celebration of the Year of Jubilee
- 55Let us acknowledge our responsibility for this situation and renew our commitment to ameliorating it. To achieve this, we must first recognize that the earth and its resources are a gift meant for all people.
In the story of Noah’s Ark, God allowed humanity to start anew. This restart involved the restoration of and respect for the rhythms inscribed in nature by the Creator.
The Israelites were commanded to observe the Sabbath every seventh day (Gen 2:2-3; Ex 16:23, 20:10). Furthermore, every seventh year, the land was to rest from sowing (Lev 25:1-6). After 49 years, the Year of Jubilee was celebrated (v. 10). It was a time of thanksgiving, a moment to remind oneself of the earth with its bounty as a gift from God to all people. This occasion also provided an opportunity to share the abundance of the earth with those in need, including the poor, widows, orphans, foreigners, and travelers. It was a chance for restoration and healing of life-giving communion.
The Natural and Moral Structure of Human Beings
- 56Such a biblical perspective urges us to reconsider the intrinsic dignity of the world, which has been damaged by those who have succumbed to modern technocracy and now see nature merely as a place or raw material needed for work. “Not only has God given the earth to man, who must use it with respect for the original good purpose for which it was given to him, but man too is God’s gift to man. He must therefore respect the natural and moral structure with which he has been endowed” (John Paul II, Centesimus Annus 38, quoted in LS 115).
Regarding ecological conversion, which involves returning to one’s natural and moral structure, Laudato Si’ intensively discusses the importance of ecological education and spirituality as foundations for addressing environmental issues (cf. LS, Chapter 6). At the heart of it all is the awareness of our shared responsibility regarding the ecological crisis to “restore the various levels of ecological equilibrium, establishing harmony within ourselves, with others, with nature and other living creatures, and with God” (LS 210). Ecological education and spirituality of this kind provide a basis for an ethics that seeks reconciliation in various fields of one’s life and facilitates making the leap towards the transcendent.
A Healthy Relationship with Creation
- 57St. Francis of Assisi is often regarded as a model of this way of life. St. Francis testified that “a healthy relationship with creation is one dimension of overall personal conversion” (LS 218). This conversion requires adopting attitudes that foster both generosity and tenderness. The Pope emphasizes that above all, it is gratitude and gratuitousness, with a proper recognition that the world is God’s loving gift, and that we are called quietly to imitate His generosity through self-sacrifice and good works (cf. LS 220).
It also entails a loving awareness that we are not disconnected from the rest of creatures, but joined in a splendid universal communion. … By developing our individual, God-given capacities, an ecological conversion can inspire us to greater creativity and enthusiasm in resolving the world’s problems and in offering ourselves to God “as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable” (Rom 12:1) (LS 220).
The Example of the Good Samaritan
- 58This kind of conversion also leads to the spirit of brotherly and sisterly love and social fraternity, which is the message of Pope Francis’ encyclical Fratelli tutti (2020). This encyclical, which was made public at the grave of St. Francis of Assisi on the eve of his Memorial Day, invites us to dream of “a universal aspiration to fraternity, … as a single human family, as fellow travelers sharing the same flesh” (FT 8), reminding us that no one can save themselves alone amid the global crisis caused by the coronavirus pandemic.
Given that democracy, freedom and justice are often misconceived, egoism has grown, indifference to common good has spread, and the logic of the market based on the pursuit of profit and throwaway culture dominates, the same encyclical faces the real issues: the prevalence of unemployment, racism, hate speech, poverty, inequality of rights, human trafficking, oppression of women, forced abortions, and organ trafficking, as well as the threat to peace posed by nuclear weapons and war. Facing such darkness in the world, what we can do is to remember the example of the Good Samaritan (Lk 10:25 ff), to overcome our prejudices and self-interests, and to stand together with others.
Participation in Trinitarian Communion
- 59Behind the technocratic mentality that hindered such a conversion, there may be implied a certain bias in the image of God. That is, we may have seen a God of omniscience and omnipotence, a God who exercises power over all, but not a God who is a communion of love. Yet we are living in the life that God gives us.
I came so that the sheep might have life and have it more abundantly (Jn 10:10).
I am the vine, you are the branches. Whoever remains in me and I in him will bear much fruit (Jn 15:5).
And in our Eucharistic celebration, we offer the fruits of the earth to God and receive Jesus himself as life itself. In Eucharistic Prayer IV, the presiding priest, after the blessing of the bread and wine, prays to the Triune God as follows:
Look, O Lord, upon the Sacrifice
which you yourself have provided for your Church,
and grant in your loving kindness
to all who partake of this one Bread and one Chalice
that, gathered into one body by the Holy Spirit,
they may truly become a living sacrifice in Christ
to the praise of your glory.
…
To all of us, your children,
grant, O merciful Father,
that we may enter into a heavenly inheritance…
…
There, with the whole of creation,
freed from the corruption of sin and death,
may we glorify you through Christ our Lord.
For us, life is the communion of God’s love. In “A Christian Prayer in Union with Creation”, which concludes Laudato Si’, Pope Francis contemplates the communion of love within the Holy Trinity, focusing respectively on God the Father, Jesus Christ the Son, and the Holy Spirit. What we are called to do now is to immerse ourselves in this prayer and to participate in the communion of God’s love.
Father,
we praise you with all your creatures.
They came forth from your all-powerful hand;
they are yours,
filled with your presence and your tender love.
Praise be to you!
Son of God, Jesus,
through you all things were made.
You were formed in the womb of Mary our Mother,
you became part of this earth,
and you gazed upon this world with human eyes.
Today you are alive in every creature
in your risen glory.
Praise be to you!
Holy Spirit, by your light
you guide this world towards the Father’s love
and accompany creation as it groans in travail.
You also dwell in our hearts
and you inspire us to do what is good.
Praise be to you!
Triune Lord,
wondrous community of infinite love,
teach us to contemplate you
in the beauty of the universe,
for all things speak of you.
Awaken our praise and thankfulness
for every being that you have made.
Give us the grace to feel profoundly joined
to everything that is.
God of love,
show us our place in this world
as channels of your love for all the creatures of this earth,
for not one of them is forgotten in your sight.
Enlighten those who possess power and money
that they may avoid the sin of indifference,
that they may love the common good, advance the weak,
and care for this world in which we live.
The poor and the earth are crying out.
O Lord,
seize us with your power and light,
help us to protect all life,
to prepare for a better future,
for the coming of your Kingdom
of justice, peace, love and beauty.
Praise be to you!
Amen.
II. PAPAL MINISTRY ATTENTIVE TO THE SIGNS OF THE TIMES
- 60Next, we will discuss statements by contemporary popes that illustrate the main points of the basic stance of the Catholic Church since the Second Vatican Council. These are the authoritative words of popes who serve the people of God through their ministerial office of teaching and governing. They reveal the popes’ fidelity to their own ministries, which are meant to be attentive to the signs of the times.
Environmental problems consist of resource issues such as depletion of water, land, forests, mineral reserves, and fossil fuels as well as air pollution, water pollution, soil contamination, deforestation, desertification, climate change, biodiversity loss, garbage problems, and so forth.
Since the time of the Second Vatican Council, the Catholic Church has taken such environmental issues in the context of the relationship of humankind to all creation and the Creator, and has recognized them as challenges for human beings created in the image of God.
Man, created to God’s image, received a mandate to subject to himself the earth and all it contains, and to govern the world with justice and holiness; a mandate to relate himself and the totality of things to Him Who was to be acknowledged as the Lord and Creator of all. Thus, by the subjection of all things to man, the name of God would be wonderful in all the earth (Gaudium et Spes 34).
Ethical Criteria Emphasized by the Popes
- 61Recent popes have emphasized the following ethical criteria in considering environmental issues. The first is “reverence for life”, followed by the others listed below.
- An awareness that the environment is a public good, a common good for humanity, and that its care, or responsible management, is a universal obligation of humankind.
- A sincere acceptance of the fact that natural resources are limited and some of them are non-renewable.
- A recognition of our obligation to hand down the earth to future generations without devastating it.
- A serious consideration of energy issues in the protection and preservation of the global environment.
- An understanding that peacebuilding and nature conservation are closely related, and that war significantly wastes natural resources.
- A shift to a way of life or lifestyle in accordance with human ecology.
(cf. LS 5, 148, 155; John Paul II, Centesimus Annus, 38; Benedict XVI, Caritas in Veritate, 51).
In their World Day of Peace messages to the entire world at the beginning of the year, John Paul II and Benedict XVI, before Francis, positioned environmental issues as part of the ecological crisis —a dysfunctional relationship between living organisms (biological activities) and their habitats (the necessary conditions for them), and addressed them as ecological issues that involve a broad, shared ethical responsibility.
1 POPE JOHN PAUL II
The Patron Saint of Those who Promote Ecology
- 62In his 1990 World Day of Peace Message entitled “Peace with God the Creator, Peace with All of Creation,” John Paul II made it clear that the ecological crisis is a moral problem and that overcoming it is the common responsibility of all humanity.
As mentioned at the end of his message, he had already declared St. Francis of Assisi “patron of those who promote ecology” in 1979. The decision to name St. Francis of Assisi as the right person to lead the way in ecological spirituality is firmly to place him once more in the mainstream of the spiritual tradition of the Catholic Church, instead of keeping him on its fringe.
The following words are reminiscent of Laudato Si’:
[Saint Francis of Assisi] offers Christians an example of genuine and deep respect for the integrity of creation. As a friend of the poor who was loved by God’s creatures, Saint Francis invited all of creation — animals, plants, natural forces, even Brother Sun and Sister Moon—to give honour and praise to the Lord. The poor man of Assisi gives us striking witness that when we are at peace with God we are better able to devote ourselves to building up that peace with all creation which is inseparable from peace among all peoples (Papal Message for the 1990 World Day of Peace 16).
True Meaning of Human Ecology
- 63In his encyclical Centesimus Annus (1991), John Paul II spoke of the true meaning of human ecology, referring to the more serious destruction of the human environment that must be addressed in addition to the irrational destruction of the natural environment (cf. Centesimus Annus 38-39).
Simply put, human ecology is a study and practice based on “the natural and moral structure with which he[man] has been endowed [by God]”. It can be seen as a return to the original economy of human life guided by four cardinal virtues of prudence, justice, fortitude, and temperance. In fact, the sound economy of human life cannot be realized without due appreciation of our God-given “essential dignity and with it the capacity to transcend every social order so as to move towards truth and goodness”. A true human ecology must therefore include a constant effort to “destroy such structures of sin” that prevent “living in accordance with the truth” and bring about the oppressions that impede “full realization”, and to “replace them with more authentic forms of living in community”.
He also mentioned the importance of the family as the foundation of human ecology, saying that in the family “man receives his first formative ideas about truth and goodness, and learns what it means to love and to be loved, and thus what it actually means to be a person”, and that “it[the family] is the place in which life—the gift of God—can be properly welcomed and protected against the many attacks to which it is exposed, and can develop in accordance with what constitutes authentic human growth”. The family is indeed the “heart of the culture of life”.
2 POPE BENEDICT XVI
Three Obligations Regarding the Use of Natural Resources
- 64In his Message for the 2010 World Day of Peace entitled “If You Want to Cultivate Peace, Protect Creation,” Benedict XVI, like John Paul II, said, “protecting the natural environment in order to build a world of peace is thus a duty incumbent upon each and all. It is an urgent challenge, one to be faced with renewed and concerted commitment” (Papal Message for the 2010 World Day of Peace 14). He also stated, that “the ecological problem must be dealt with not only because of the chilling prospects of environmental degradation on the horizon; the real motivation must be the quest for authentic world-wide solidarity inspired by the values of charity, justice and the common good” (Ibid. 10).
In this message, the Pope listed three obligations regarding the use of natural resources (cf. Ibid. 8) This list certainly presents one of the guidelines that we should always keep in mind.
- Immediate benefits should not have a negative impact on living creatures, human and non-human, present and future.
- The protection of private property should not conflict with the universal destination of goods.
- Human activity should not compromise the fruitfulness of the earth, for the benefit of people now and in the future.
The Overall Moral Tenor of Society
- 65Furthermore, in his encyclical Caritas in Veritate (2009), he also stated as follows:
If there is a lack of respect for the right to life and to a natural death, if human conception, gestation and birth are made artificial, if human embryos are sacrificed to research, the conscience of society ends up losing the concept of human ecology and, along with it, that of environmental ecology. It is contradictory to insist that future generations respect the natural environment when our educational systems and laws do not help them to respect themselves. The book of nature is one and indivisible: it takes in not only the environment but also life, sexuality, marriage, the family, social relations: in a word, integral human development (Caritas in Veritate 51).
In the same passage, the Pope affirms that the Church has “a responsibility towards creation and she must assert this responsibility in the public sphere” and “must above all protect mankind from self-destruction”. He also insists that “the overall moral tenor of society” is crucial for protecting nature.
Human ecology cannot exist without the overall moral tenor of society. It is impossible for human ecology not to address the untruth of treating the unique place of human beings as separate from the natural world, both of which form one unified reality. At the very least, such an approach should never be called human ecology. In his address to the German Parliament, the Pope clearly sees humankind as users of natural resources and, therefore as subjects responsible for their use. He refers to this concept of human ecology using the expression “ecology of man (Ökologie des Menschen)” (cf. LS 155).
What is required of us now is study and practice to examine and provide the habitat, in other words, the conditions required for the intrinsic economy of life proper to a human person (an individual organism), who makes a unique journey starting with conception and birth, through growing up and aging, up to dying and beyond, that is, the conditions that make integral human life possible.
3 POPE FRANCIS
Toward an Integral Ecology
- 66In Laudato Si’, Pope Francis wrote, “Pope Benedict XVI spoke of an ‘ecology of man’, based on the fact that ‘man too has a nature that he must respect and that he cannot manipulate at will’” (LS 155). This reminds us that human existence, like other natural things, is subject to the rules of nature and incorporated into the web of life, the intrinsic economy of which must be respected. He adds: “Learning to respect our body … and its fullest meaning is an essential element of any genuine human ecology.” This is a warning against “thinking that we enjoy absolute power over our own bodies” (LS 155).
In the same encyclical, the Pope asks whether the problems of poverty and inequality are inherently linked to environmental problems, stating: “when we speak of the ‘environment’, what we really mean is a relationship existing between nature and the society which lives in it” (LS 139). He thus affirms that environmental and social problems are interconnected and must not be treated in isolation.
He also emphasizes that ecology, which “studies the relationship between living organisms and the environment in which they develop,” “necessarily entails reflection and debate about the conditions required for the life and survival of society,” and “the honesty needed to question certain models of development, production and consumption” (LS 138). It offers a vision of an integral ecology that can fundamentally reveal the structure of environmental problems and point to paths for their radical resolution and holistic transformation.
Ecological Awareness and Behavior
- 67The basic character of ecological awareness and behavior is evident in the sincerity of the honest acknowledgment that “recognizing the reasons why a given area is polluted requires a study of the workings of society, its economy, its behaviour patterns, and the ways it grasps reality” (LS 139).
“Faced not with two separate crises, one environmental and the other social, but rather with one complex crisis which is both social and environmental,” it is “essential to seek comprehensive solutions which consider the interactions within natural systems themselves and with social systems.” Thus, “an integrated approach to combating poverty, restoring dignity to the excluded, and at the same time protecting nature” (LS 139) is needed. We cannot help but strongly agree with these points.
Economy, Society, and Culture in Constant Interaction with Nature
- 68The Pope, who states, “we are part of nature, included in it and thus in constant interaction with it” (LS 139), calls us to renew our awareness of an important aspect of human existence that is prone to being neglected and left behind: our proper place within nature. He urges us always to return to it.
Laudato Si’, which is a developmental continuation of the arguments of the former popes, presents in its core chapter four, which offers “a vision capable of taking into account every aspect of the global crisis” (LS 137). It addresses the conditions that support an integral economy of human life: the economy, society, culture, ways of life, human understanding, solidarity-mindedness, and a prayerful heart. It can be called a gaze that is focused on the care for life as such.
Such an approach with a broader vision to the ecological crisis has been named integral ecology.
It is a wise approach that affirms all dimensions of being human, that respects all aspects of human life, and that illuminates the path back to the original economy of human life: the wisdom to live together; the wisdom to protect and govern our common home.
We are called to make a series of modest efforts, trusting and hoping in God, who empowers and enlightens us to create a better future.
Part III
ACT
ACTING FOR LIVING TOGETHER
- 69“I ask everyone to accompany this pilgrimage of reconciliation with the world that is our home and to help make it more beautiful, because that commitment has to do with our personal dignity and highest values” (LD 69).
Pope Francis repeatedly emphasizes our responsible engagement. After taking steps to «see» and «discern», we are invited to «act». Acting includes launching new activities, but it is important to begin by reflecting on our daily deeds and habits.
Let us consider how to renew our lifestyles in the light of each one’s context: at home, at school, at work, in the local setting, in the faith community, and so on. This can also mean joining the circle of goodwill of people who commit themselves to proactively addressing environmental issues, encouraging each other with the slogan “think globally, act locally”.
Above all, the lay faithful are invited to be ministers of the Gospel in society by “express[ing] the truth of their faith and, at the same time, the truth of the Church’s social doctrine, complying with the different demands of their particular area of work” (Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, 551).
For the harmonious integration of life and faith, and the practice that comes from it as well, it is essential to develop an appropriate spirituality and derive strength from it (cf. Ibid. 545, 546).
In Part III here below, we will present directives for «acting» (guidelines for action) based on the integral ecology that the Catholic Church has been disseminating, along with “ecological spirituality” and “ecological education” that support and guide our actions.
Behavior modification can be painful and inconvenient. However, each one of us is required to make concrete decisions.
I. WITNESSING TO GOD’S LOVE AS A RESPONSIBLE GLOBAL CITIZEN
Sowing the Seeds of Beauty for Future Generations
- 70Every person and community must take seriously the mission entrusted to them by the Creator: to deepen the ecological conversion called for by the Pope, to review each one’s lifestyle and daily actions, and to sow the seeds of beauty for future generations.
Pope Francis urges us: “The Lord asks us from his cross to rediscover the life that awaits us, to look towards those who look to us, to strengthen, recognize and foster the grace that lives within us” (Extraordinary Moment of Prayer and Urbi et Orbi Blessing, March 27, 2020).
Liberation from Fear, Greed and Compulsion
- 71The actions we are invited to take involve not only changes in our personal lifestyles, but also major transformations in the scheme of production and consumption, politics, and more.
In implementing these actions, we must keep in mind that everything that exists is a gift from God (cf. LS 5), and seek “solutions … in a change of humanity” (LS 9), which is not merely a symptomatic treatment, but a genuine redirection of our hearts. It “entails learning to give, and not simply to give up. It is a way of loving, of moving gradually away from what I want to what God’s world needs. It is liberation from fear, greed and compulsion” (Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, “Lecture at the Monastery of Utstein, Norway” (23 June 2003), quoted in LS 9).
Christians who have been entrusted with responsible roles in society and in the Church should not forget that there are challenges to be addressed through the community network (cf. LS 219). Let us take concrete steps forward, learning from the good initiatives already underway in society and fostering cooperation across cultures and religions.
Witnessing to God’s Love for All
- 72As we have seen, for Christians, the effort to overcome the ecological crisis, as revealed through environmental problems, is a conversion from a way of life that has destroyed the world created by God, and a journey towards restoring proper relationships with God, with others, with the earth, and with our own selves. This means witnessing to God’s love for people and all of creation through our lives, in other words, living out and proclaiming the Gospel. This is the foundation of evangelization.
I cannot fail in this regard to remind the Catholic faithful of the motivations born of their faith. I encourage my brothers and sisters of other religions to do the same, since we know that authentic faith not only gives strength to the human heart, but also transforms life, transfigures our goals and sheds light on our relationship to others and with creation as a whole (LD 61).
Since the First National Incentive Convention for Evangelization (NICE-1) in 1987, the Church in Japan has recognized the “gap between faith and life” and the ”gap between the Church and society,” and has continued its effort to deepen the connection between them. Now, as responsible global citizens, we must further advance our efforts to witness to God’s love by working toward the realization of reconciliation with God, reconciliation with others, and reconciliation with creation.
1 ECOLOGICAL SPIRITUALITY
The Long Path of Renewal
- 73The Pope invites us to walk together on the “long path of renewal” (LS 202) by helping each other to create awareness of a future shared by all. The sixth chapter of Laudato Si’ insists that such a long path of renewal needs an ecological education springing from ecological spirituality. The Pope’s words at the beginning of that chapter, “a great cultural, spiritual and educational challenge,” cannot be overlooked.
Many things have to change course, but it is we human beings above all who need to change. We lack an awareness of our common origin, of our mutual belonging, and of a future to be shared with everyone. This basic awareness would enable the development of new convictions, attitudes and forms of life. A great cultural, spiritual and educational challenge stands before us, and it will demand that we set out on the long path of renewal (LS 202).
Pope Francis is convinced that, if we remain only in the realm of doctrine, we cannot fulfil our commitment to so noble an undertaking without a spirituality that inspires us. He looks to the heritage of Christian spirituality which “has a precious contribution to make to the renewal of humanity” and tells us that his mind is focused on “how such a spirituality can motivate us to a more passionate concern for the protection of our world” (LS 216).
Spirituality — The Wellspring of Wisdom and Strength for Living
- 74To speak of spirituality is to speak of the universe of the human heart. It is a world that exists regardless of whether we have a religion or not. Through various encounters and events, we experience a variety of emotions in our hearts, get new insights, feel serious pains and embrace promising hopes.
These movements of one’s heart play a major role in influencing one’s way of life and shaping one’s life journey. As we take in and reflect on these experiences, our horizons are broadened, our hearts are enriched and a new awareness of our own place in the world is born within us. Thus, we come to a deep sense of our bond with all living creatures.
Contemplating nature, we somehow appreciate its hidden mystery. Meeting people, we empathize with their joys and sufferings, hopes and difficulties. Thereby, we realize that we live in profound solidarity with each other and with all living things. We are deeply moved by the mystery of life and compelled to take action to protect and nurture it. The true meaning of “being-with” and “living-with” becomes transparent.
The word “spirituality” indicates such a wellspring of wisdom and strength for living. We are transformed in this process, and our efforts to address environmental issues are sustained as well.
Life — a Gift of Love
- 75For the Christian, faith provides a deeper foundation for the inner universe of one’s heart. It leads us to a deep gratitude as we become convinced not only that we “have” life, but also that life is “given” to us.
We believe that the life given to us is a gift of love and that it will reach its fullness in love. We share life with all creatures, and we know that it has its origin in God.
Faith leads to the experience of the mystery of God’s love. Unlike other creatures, we possess the capacity to become aware of this mystery and to give thanks to God for it. And this gratitude is expressed through our attitude and conduct toward other creatures. We are called to respond freely to this gift.
Contemplating the beauty of the natural world as well as the wonder and mystery of life leads us to praise God and invites us to renew our commitment to protect all life. It also leads us to a deeper awareness of our connection with the Creator, with other humans created in the likeness of God and with all things created by God’s love. It helps us to perceive the call to preserve the harmony among them all. From this arises an unwavering peace within one’s heart.
“Thy will be Done”
- 76This ecological spirituality leads to harmony with oneself, harmony with others, harmony with nature, and harmony with God. It is the will of God the Creator that this harmony be preserved, and we pray daily “Thy will be done”.
Therefrom, the fundamental question arises: Is our lifestyle contributing to maintaining, deepening, and consolidating this harmony, and, if so, in what sense?
Faced with these questions posed by ecological spirituality, we are urged toward ecological conversion. As the Pope points out, true freedom consists in choosing to live in harmony with all of creation, liberated from the slavery of consumerism (cf. LS 203, 223).
Let us savor the following words of the Book of Wisdom, give thanks for the life we have been given, and ask for the wisdom and strength to nurture it:
Yes, you love everything that exists, and nothing that you have made disgusts you, since, if you had hated something, you would not have made it. And how could a thing subsist, had you not willed it? Or how be preserved, if not called forth by you? No, you spare all, since all is yours, Lord, lover of life! (Wis 11:24-26, New Jerusalem Bible 1985)
2 ECOLOGICAL EDUCATION
Motivation and the Processes of Education
- 77Today, the need for ecological education that imparts knowledge and develops the capacity to tackle the ecological crisis is indisputable.
But such an education must also be a service to life, lavishing upon it the gift of wisdom and strength that springs from the fountain of ecological spirituality. With water that quenches thirst and invigorates vitality, trees grow, bearing fruit for food and producing leaves for healing (Ezek 47:12, Rev 22:2).
What is required is an education which shows the way to stimulate an integral development of not only each person but also the entire human race, and creates a virtuous cycle between generations, continuing to bring about life-giving food and medicine that restores wellness.
Therefore, there is great significance in motivation and the processes of education that encourage people to seek out the wealth of ecological spirituality, like St. Francis of Assisi, found in the “treasure of Christian spiritual experience” (LS 15).
Ecological education, through such motivation and educational processes, creates “ecological citizenship” (LS 211), transforms lifestyles and cultivates a sense of responsibility towards the environment. It would support harmonious growth, nurture an appreciation for beauty, encourage “simple gestures” that “help to create a culture of shared life and respect for our surroundings” (LS 213), and elicit actions and practices that are acts of love.
The home is a particularly important setting for such ecological education:
In the family we first learn how to show love and respect for life; we are taught the proper use of things, order and cleanliness, respect for the local ecosystem and care for all creatures (LS 213).
It would be wonderful if our efforts to eliminate or alleviate environmental problems, preserve nature, and safeguard the environment could begin with lessons learned at home. Meeting the challenge entrusted to mankind to protect all life according to the Creator’s will begins at home.
If we heed the call of Laudato Si’ to nurture people who care for the earth, our common home, each ecclesial community can also serve as another home.
A Call to Shape History Together
- 78Our contemporary task of protecting all life involves nurturing an integrally harmonious web of life without compromising the material circulation that connects all things. It means sincerely accepting and faithfully fulfilling the mission and responsibility entrusted to human beings, who have been created with dignity.
It is an invitation to shape history together through a collaborative journey of integral ecology that fosters the harmonious growth of the four fundamental relationships that constitute human existence: with God, with others, with nature, and with one’s own self. This is the path of authentic human development, grounded in an integral and solidary humanism.
Parents, educators, and various social groups—including the ecclesial community—are urged to reconsider their responsibilities regarding ecological education in service of fostering an awareness that sees challenges as calls to action and crises as opportunities.
If we want to bring about deep change, we need to realize that certain mindsets really do influence our behaviour. Our efforts at education will be inadequate and ineffectual unless we strive to promote a new way of thinking about human beings, life, society and our relationship with nature (LS 215).
A New and Universal Solidarity
- 79Ecological education is a sincere response to the pressing issue of safeguarding our common home, while striving for unity and sustainable integral development of the human family.
Healing the wounds caused by the abuses of the creation will require a creative dialogue about the future of the planet we seek to shape, in addition to our cooperation according to respective cultures, experiences, initiatives, and talents.
Therefore, it requires a “new and universal solidarity” (LS 14) that does not succumb to “obstructionist attitudes” that range from denial and indifference to cold resignation or blind faith in technical solutions to problems. Mutual support and cooperation that cultivate “sound virtues” (LS 211) and “self-control and willingness to learn from one another” (LS 214), are essential if most members of society are to be sufficiently motivated and transformed into responsible, selfless, ecologically committed individuals.
The best ecology always has an educational dimension that can encourage the development of new habits in individuals and groups (QA 58).
3 LEARNING FROM ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION
- 80The United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (1972), the first international conference on the issue of the environment, is said to have marked the first occasion when “environmental education” was publicly discussed, highlighting its importance. As a result, the need for awareness-raising in addressing the issue of the environment came to be widely recognized.
Thereafter, international conferences in the late 1970s gradually shaped a common framework for environmental education, identifying five key objectives: awareness, knowledge, attitudes, participation, and skills (including evaluation skills).
Laudato Si’ describes the development of environmental education up to the present day as follows:
Environmental education has broadened its goals. Whereas in the beginning it was mainly centred on scientific information, consciousness-raising and the prevention of environmental risks, it tends now to include a critique of the “myths” of a modernity grounded in a utilitarian mindset (individualism, unlimited progress, competition, consumerism, the unregulated market). It seeks also to restore the various levels of ecological equilibrium, establishing harmony within ourselves, with others, with nature and other living creatures, and with God (LS 210).
Nature conservation education and pollution education in Japan are in line with environmental education. However, as both the issues themselves and the ways in which they are understood have evolved, our concept of environmental education has also undergone a major transformation.
Education for Sustainable Consumption
- 81During Japan’s period of rapid economic growth, the issue of pollution was regarded as the central environmental issue, and a critical perspective opposing the government and industry prevailed.
In contrast, nowadays, one of the key themes is a change in lifestyle for all, based on the recognition that citizens in general, as consumers, also participate in the problem-causing structure of mass-consumption society, against the backdrop of disparities in the globalized economic market.
As mentioned earlier, the structure of mass production, mass consumption, and mass disposal is a major cause of environmental problems. Increasingly, attention is being paid to the impact of our participation as consumers, which drives mass consumption and results in mass disposal.
As the Pope said, “purchasing is always a moral – and not simply economic – act” (LS 206). We citizens are now called to engage in ethical consumption, choosing products that are ethically acceptable through their entire life cycle, from production up to disposal. Education for sustainable consumption, which urges us to make a shift from the structure of mass-consumption society toward an authentic one as it should be, is also an important perspective.
The goals of environmental education in a narrower sense can be roughly classified into reduction or solution of existing problems and prevention of potential ones. In contrast, environmental education in a broader sense is often referred to as value-based education. This is because it means examining our way of life in its depth inasmuch as we are responsible agents who can create a society that makes the most of the rich potentiality of both people and nature without compromising it.
Being informed of environmental problems does not necessarily lead to an ecological way of life in which ethical consumption becomes the norm. We need an education that inspires both our mind and heart towards ecological lifestyles and motivates us to enjoy ecological living and fellowship.
With the growing awareness of such issues, and a focus on the process of enhancing learning through hands-on participation and collaboration, people can now view the creation of projects to make a sustainable society and the very process of engaging in a collaborative journey with others as environmental education in the broadest sense of the term.
Education to Foster Citizenship
- 82In the practice of environmental education, it is more important to learn from successful examples in the pursuit of a sustainable circular-oriented society than from problems. These examples demonstrate practices that are globally minded while locally rooted.
Amid interconnectedness of all issues, efforts to create sustainable regions—known as the Regional Circular and Ecological Sphere (local Sustainable Development Goals)—are gaining momentum. These initiatives enable existing separate sectors such as industry, daily life, and education to be viewed and addressed in a cross-sectional way. Education to cultivate the leaders of such initiatives, namely, education to foster citizenship in a broad sense (citizenship education), is thus an indispensable element of environmental education.
The perspective of sustainable community building naturally encourages consideration for the local unique ecosystems that are critical in shaping the relationship between people and nature. It also fosters learning from cultures rooted in the region that are rich in the wisdom of harmonious coexistence between humans and nature, and highlights the intergenerational ties that connect people across time.
If in our own lives we have an appreciation of the wisdom inherited from the past, it becomes easier to develop a sense of responsibility toward future generations. In local communities where people lead their daily lives, people from various backgrounds live together. The experience of collaboration with others who hold different values or follow different religions not only fosters understanding of the issues to be tackled and the differences to be respected, but also provides the impetus to work toward the common goal of care for our common home.
The joyful experience of collaborating with such people bears hope for a positive and meaningful life, even in a world with all kinds of problems.
In such a context, we cannot forget that the family, the basic provider of food, clothing, and shelter, is the very foundation and starting point.
It is not easy to address the waste problem, which stems from and contributes to the dysfunctional circulation of water and other resources, despite being indifferent to nature’s bounty felt in daily life. A family that appreciates and cares for the resources available to it will be naturally motivated toward activities at the district or neighborhood level, the smallest unit in the circulation of resources. It is no exaggeration to say that an ecologically oriented society is supported by the small but careful daily actions of the members of these small organizations.
4 SHAPING HISTORY TOGETHER
The True Path Toward Peace
- 83In Laudato Si’, all four of the “four principles” needed for “building a people in peace, justice and fraternity” (cf. EG 221), which the Pope had already outlined in his Apostolic Exhortation, Evangelii Gaudium (2014), are present.
The Pope’s strong conviction “that their application can be a genuine path to peace within each nation and in the entire world” (EG 221) is also evident in Laudato Si’. It can be considered a call to shape the course of history together, by becoming people who yearn for “peace, justice and fraternity” and seek “a genuine path to peace” (Ibid.).
Realities Are Greater Than Ideas
- 84The first principle is “realities are greater than ideas.”
This is the recognition that it is “realities illuminated by reason”, not “ideas disconnected from realities” (cf. EG 232), that lead human persons to action. It is “an attitude of positive appreciation for the whole, for the relationships between things, and for the broader horizon” (cf. LS 110). It implies the intellectual mastery to find appropriate solutions to concrete situations that present “more complex problems …, particularly those regarding the environment and the poor”, “a number of symptoms which point to what is wrong, such as environmental degradation, anxiety, a loss of the purpose of life and of community living” (LS 110). Such intellectual mastery consists in the firmness and prudence necessary to shape history.
It helps us effectively confront environmental issues through dialogue that avoids the tendency among the sciences “to become enclosed in its own language, while specialization leads to a certain isolation and the absolutization of its own field of knowledge”, and through dialogue “for the sake of protecting nature, defending the poor, and building networks of respect and fraternity” (LS 201).
The severity of the ecological crisis we face cannot be addressed without a broad-based concern for the common good and the initiation of dialogue with love and respect for life.
The Whole Is Greater Than the Part
- 85The second principle is “the whole is greater than the part”.
This is demonstrated in the following way: “nor do people who wholeheartedly enter into the life of a community need to lose their individualism or hide their identity; instead, they receive new impulses to personal growth” (EG 235).
Today’s environmental issues cannot be analyzed in isolation from the “human, family, work-related and urban contexts, nor from how individuals relate to themselves, which leads in turn to how they relate to others and to the environment” (LS 141). We must therefore return to the urgently needed “humanism capable of bringing together the different fields of knowledge, including economics, in the service of a more integral and integrating vision” (LS 141), that is, return to an integral understanding of human beings that is necessary for shaping history together.
Time Is Greater Than Space
- 86The third principle is “time is greater than space”.
This means “to give priority to actions which generate new processes in society and engage other persons and groups who can develop them to the point where they bear fruit in significant historical events” (EG 223). It is a solid standpoint from which we can say that “we are always more effective when we generate processes rather than holding on to positions of power” (LS 178), and it represents the steady and consistent policy needed to shaping history together.
Unity Is Greater Than Conflict
- 87The fourth principle is “unity is greater than conflict”.
This means “to build communion amid disagreement”, a capacity found only in those “persons who are willing to go beyond the surface of the conflict and to see others in their deepest dignity” (EG 228). It entails a freedom without fixed ideas that allows both parties to “acknowledge their own mistakes and find forms of interaction directed to the common good” (cf. LS 198) as well as the humility necessary to shape history together.
II. TOWARD AN ECCLESIAL COMMUNITY JOURNEYING AND DISCERNING TOGETHER
- 88These qualities and awareness needed to shape history together are required of every responsible global citizen. At the same time, they are also characteristics of a people called together as a sign of the “genuine path to peace” (EG 221) that will bring fundamental changes in this world, that is, the conditions for forming a community which journeys and discerns together.
Synodality
- 89“Once you were ‘no people’, but now you are God’s people; you ‘had not received mercy’ but now you have received mercy” (1 Pet 2:10). This verse expresses our gratitude for being made a member of a people with dignity, free from discord, quarrels, dispersion, and obstruction. A people has been born anew who places its hope in God’s mercy, which brings the Kingdom of love, justice, and peace.
This people is an entity united by the solidarity of those who are no longer bound by the idea that the purpose of life is to gain a better position or greater wealth, and who no longer find themselves powerless and helpless in face of monstrous powers. They are also united by the bonds of people who are free from the arrogance of seeing nature as an object of exploitation, and who enjoy it with gratitude as a gift to be passed on in a sound condition to the next generation.
There is an ecclesial community here that is dedicated to promoting the common good by walking with the Lord, who gave Himself for the salvation of all, on the journey to protect all life, discerning together in trust in God who guides all things.
Community discernment like this is grounded in fundamental values such as respect for human life from conception to death, protecting human dignity, cherishing freedom, valuing justice and creation, caring for family bonds built on joy and trust and liturgical celebrations of thanksgiving and praise. It is a culture of dialogue in which we can work together to shape the future, inspired by our common hope, even in the face of serious gaps in position and opinion.
The Church, by nature a community of walking and discerning together, established the Synod of Bishops after the Second Vatican Council, which has since held meetings on mission and pastoral matters, as well as on issues specific to particular regions. The word “Synod” derives from the Greek ”syn” (with, together) and “hodos” (way, path) meaning ”to walk together” or ”to walk the same path.” This approach, which emphasizes walking together, is called synodality.
The XVI Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops, announced on May 21, 2021, marked a significant step in expanding synodality by directly involving the Catholic Church worldwide all the way down to the level the laity.
The Laudato Si’ Action Platform
- 90Pope Francis published a video message on May 25 of the same year, announcing the launch of the Laudato Si’ Action Platform. This platform is being offered for seven years by the Vatican Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development to achieve a “more inclusive, fraternal, peaceful and sustainable world”.
Specifically, it invites seven groups—families, parishes and dioceses, educational institutions, healthcare institutions, various organizations and groups, the economic sector, and consecrated religious—to create and implement a Laudato Si’ Plan tailored to their circumstances for addressing the Laudato Si’ Goals (LSGs), which consist of seven objectives summing up the teachings of Laudato Si’.
By registering at
laudatosiactionplatform.org, you will have access to the information you need, plans created by many others, and other useful resources.
1 LAUDATO SI’ GOALS
- 91 The seven Laudato Si’ Goals provide a guide for action to adequately address the serious ecological crisis. In addition, these goals will help us to re-create our relationships with God, with humanity, and with the earth, our common home. You may have already committed to some of the goals, but we encourage you to take a fresh look at them from an integral ecological perspective.
The following items (1)–(7) are taken from the Laudato Si’ Action Platform.(9)
(1) Response to the Cries of the Earth
- 92It is a call to protect our common home for the wellbeing of all, as we equitably address the climate crisis, biodiversity loss, and ecological sustainability.
Actions could include the adoption of renewable energies and energy sufficiency measures, achieving carbon neutrality, protecting biodiversity, promoting sustainable agriculture, and guaranteeing access to clean water for all.
(2) Response to the Cry of the Poor
- 93The Response to the Cry of the Poor is a call to promote eco-justice, aware that we are called to defend human life from conception to death, and all forms of life on Earth.
Actions could include projects to promote solidarity, with special attention given to vulnerable groups such as indigenous communities, refugees, migrants, and children at risk, analysis and improvement of social systems, and social service programmes.
(3) Ecological Economics
- 94Ecological Economics acknowledges that the economy is a sub-system of human society, which itself is embedded within the biosphere–our common home.
Actions could include sustainable production and consumption, ethical investments, divestment from fossil fuels and any activity harmful to the planet and the people, supporting circular economies, and prioritizing care labour and protecting the dignity of workers.
(4) Adoption of Sustainable Lifestyles
- 95The Adoption of Sustainable Lifestyles is grounded in the idea of sufficiency, and promoting sobriety in the use of resources and energy.
Actions could include reducing waste and recycling, adopting sustainable dietary habits (opting for a more plant-based diet and reducing meat consumption), greater use of public transport, active mobility (walking, cycling), and avoiding single use items (e.g., plastic, etc.).
5) Ecological Education
- 96Ecological Education is about re-thinking and re-designing curricular and institutional reform in the spirit of integral ecology in order to foster ecological awareness and transformative action.
Actions could include ensuring equitable access to education for all and promoting human rights, fostering Laudato Si’ themes within the community, encouraging ecological leadership (students, teachers), and ecological restoration activities.
(6) Ecological Spirituality
- 97Ecological Spirituality springs from a profound ecological conversion and helps us to “discover God in all things”, both in the beauty of creation and in the sighs of the sick and the groans of the afflicted, aware that the life of the spirit is not dissociated from worldly realities.
Actions could include promoting creation-based liturgical celebrations, developing ecological catechesis, retreats and formation programmes, etc.
(7) Community Resilience and Empowerment
- 98Community resilience and empowerment envisage a synodal journey of community engagement and participatory action at various levels.
Actions could include promoting advocacy and developing people’s campaigns, encouraging rootedness and a sense of belonging in local communities and neighbourhood ecosystems.
2 THE LAUDATO SI’ PLAN
- 99The actions to be taken will vary depending on geographic, socioeconomic, cultural, and other conditions. Therefore, you are the ones who know best how to work toward these goals. You can discuss what you can do with your family and friends, in church and religious communities, schools, and institutions, and make plans with your colleagues to work together in accordance with integral ecology.
The Laudato Si’ Action Platform provides a planning guide for the annual action plan of Laudato Si’ Goals for each group (families, parishes and dioceses, educational institutions, healthcare and healing, organizations and groups, economic sector, and religious, etc.), based on their own experiences.
Points to be Considered
- 100Here are some considerations presented by the Laudato Si’ Action Platform.
[Lifestyle]
- A shift from a throwaway culture to a culture of care that protects people and the environment.
- Learning the wisdom of coexistence with nature in each local culture and tradition of other religions.
- From a global perspective, being mindful of the possibility that products manufactured abroad exploit people and harm the environment in the process. Commitment to sustainable and ethical standards in our choices, from purchasing food and daily necessities to selecting means of transportation.
- Putting the “5Rs” into practice for reducing waste. Refuse: Use re-usable cups, opt for simple packaging. Reduce: don’t overbuy, don’t cook too much, don’t leave food (No leftovers!). Reuse: shop at recycling stores, use returnable containers. Repair: prioritize repair instead of discarding. Recycle: resource recovery, composting.
[Society]
- Activities to reach out to vulnerable populations including immigrants, refugees, displaced persons, and children and women in difficult situations.
- Elimination of all forms of discrimination, including social and cultural discrimination, particularly based on gender, race, color, status, language, and religion.
- Promoting policy advocacy or civil campaigns and engaging in dialogue with decision makers.
- Collaborative participation in community outreach and preservation activities of the neighborhood ecosystem.
- Initiatives to safeguard the local environment in cooperation with other religions and organizations.
- Shifting from fossil fuels, nuclear power, and other energy sources that threaten future generations to renewable energy sources.
[Economy]
- Promoting sustainable production and consumption, such as local production for local consumption, and fair trade.
- Supporting ethical and sustainability-based investment, as well as divesting from fossil fuel-related commodities.
- Advocating for just treatment of workers as a condition for the sustainable operation of companies.
[Spirituality]
- Devising natural surroundings that promote creation-centered prayer in homes and churches.
- In collaboration with dioceses or religious congregations, organizing retreats on ecological spirituality.
- Promoting creative activities such as prayer, poetry, writing, music, and painting.
[Church events]
- To coincide with the World Day of Prayer for the Care of Creation (celebrated annually on the first Sunday in September) and the Season of Creation, which the Church refers to as ”the Month for the Protection of All Life” (September 1 to October 4 in Japan), creating and implementing programs to foster reconciliation with God, with others, and with creation. When planning, consider children and youth, ensuring that the programs are engaging and enjoyable for them.
[Education]
- First and foremost, learning how to show love and respect for life and care for creation.
- Promoting an understanding of integral ecology with reference to the Sustainable Development Goals and Laudato Si’ Goals in the fields of education and social welfare. Additionally, training animators in integral ecology.
- Incorporating learning about integral ecology into initial and ongoing formation programs for priests, religious, and lay persons.
[At the local level]
- Efforts to reduce environmental impact (e.g., installing solar power systems) at home or on church-related property.
- Creating an atmosphere that invites people to turn their hearts to God, a space for encounters and healing, and a suitable habitat for living creatures.
[Disaster Response]
- At the diocesan level, developing a comprehensive disaster response plan, including systemic disaster prevention and mitigation measures.
How to Proceed with the Plan
- 101The following is an introduction to the small group planning process.
[Reflect]
- Discuss, for each of the Laudato Si’ Goals, what has already been implemented and to what extent, and what the challenges are, considering your own situation.
[Discern]
- Examine, discuss, and document the causes of each issue as seen from the Laudato Si’ Goals perspective.
- Discuss and document how your group’s vision and policy align with Laudato Si’ Goals.
[Act]
- Based on the results of the discernment, create an annual Laudato Si’ Plan and implement it.
- Ensure that the plan is concrete and feasible. Also, document each activity so that it can be evaluated at the end of the year.
[Evaluate]
- To conclude the year, evaluate the activities carried out, including how much was implemented, what was accomplished, what was lacking, and any new situations that needed to be addressed.
- Create an annual plan for the next year.
- If possible, share the evaluation with other groups.
[Celebrate]
- After the evaluation, come together to pray, give thanks God for the year’s progress, and celebrate.
In addition, you will find many other practical hints in
Journeying Towards Care for Our Common Home, by the Interdicasterial Working Group of the Holy See on Integral Ecology, released by the Vatican, for the Fifth Anniversary of the promulgation of
Laudato Si’. A Japanese translation is available on the
website of the Catholic Bishops’ Council of Japan (https://www.cbcj.catholic.jp/).
CONCLUSION
- 102By reading this book thus far and sharing these ideas with others, have you recognized the importance and urgency of addressing environmental issues? Do you feel compelled to do something about it immediately?
Taking some form of concrete action is certainly important. However, when taking action, it is necessary to determine what ought to be done as soon as possible and at the same time to place it within the perspective of its broader goals.
As mentioned earlier, Pope Francis frequently speaks of the principle that “time is greater than space”. This means not only trying to solve the problems at hand, but also doing what God wants us to do on the path toward the fulfillment of salvation history.
The ecological crisis manifested in environmental degradation and destruction of nature, which is also an erosion of human dignity as such, did not emerge suddenly yesterday or today. It is “the harm we have inflicted on her [our Sister, Mother Earth] by our irresponsible use and abuse of the goods with which God has endowed her” (LS 2) throughout history.
“What kind of world do we want to leave to those who come after us, to children who are now growing up?” (LS 160). While addressing environmental issues is urgent and there is not a moment to waste, something more than a stopgap measure is required. We need to fundamentally reexamine our mindset and lifestyle, and to work together to realize a world in which all life, including that of future generations, is cared for in connection with all creation.
In concluding his video message announcing the launch of the Laudato Si’ Action Platform, the Pope said:
There is hope. We can all collaborate, each one with his own culture and experience, each one with her own initiatives and capacities, so that our mother Earth may be restored to her original beauty and creation may once again shine according to God’s plan.
We must make concrete efforts toward all the seven of the Laudato Si’ Goals.
- 103Along with personal initiatives such as lifestyle changes, there are also issues that must be addressed together with others. In addition, there are some problems for which we must strongly call for serious government and political action.
It is also essential for each of us to assess what we need to do and how to do it in the various situations of life: in the family, at school, at the workplace, in our neighborhoods, in the ecclesial community, etc. We encourage you to discern the path to take by seeking enlightenment in prayer and conversing in the Spirit with others, to support one another, and to never give up.
- 104It is likely that climate change will continue. Extinct species will not return. Nor will it be easy to change social structures where vulnerable populations are more affected by environmental and social problems.
Nevertheless, we can still look back with hope on the path we have taken so far, open our hearts to the call to conversion, and strive to protect all life in harmony.
May God bless our efforts, show us the way and give us the strength to follow it.
A Christian Prayer for the Protection of All Life
God, Creator of the universe,
in your kindness you embrace everything you have made.
Enlighten each of us
so that we may hear the cries of abandoned and forgotten people
and the cry of this Earth that we have hurt so much.
Show us the way out of indifference
so that we might support poor and weak people
and treasure the Earth, our common home.
Send the power and light of the Holy Spirit upon us
to make us instruments of your love
to protect all life and open a better future
so that we might join all creation in singing your praise
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Amen.
(Approved by the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Japan, May 5, 2020)
On 26 May, the Solemnity of Holy Trinity, in the year 2024
Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Japan